dallasdave
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 32,326
- Reaction score
- 88,063
Yeah, but I don't think these turnovers are cherry

Yeah, but I don't think these turnovers are cherry

Humphries is ahead of both of them.
Amendola.....hurt too much. They need someone capable of at least 14 or more games a year.Beasley is ahead of Amendola.
Amendola minus Brady = JAG.
If I'm going to pay more than 8 mil a year for a slot WR his last name better be Humphries
I wouldn’t lose one second of sleep worrying about how to replace Beasley. I’d move on cheaply at that position and wisely invest my money where you can witness the fruits of how it was spent.
Don’t misunderstand me, I like Beasley at his old price tag, but in a bang-for-buck league, the second you have to pay sizeable contracts to guys like him and Hitchens last year, you walk away with a smile on your face knowing you played that process correctly and milked every bit of decent production from a small contract as long as you could. Duplicate that in someone new, and don’t EVER overpay for it.
If Amendola is a one year, low risk insurance policy to finding that guy, that’s fine by me. The mistake would be overpaying for a slot when history says you don’t have to.
I disagree, if you happen to think that any of these guys is better at this point than Beasley than maybe you are correct but if not than it brings 3 more teams into play to potentially sign Beasley if he becomes a FA, i think moves like these by other teams will only drive up his priceBeasley’s price keeps going down.
Humphries, Crowder, Amendola
... in case we trust lolMoore's new offence.... good one![]()
Yeah, but I don't think these turnovers are cherry![]()

I disagree, if you happen to think that any of these guys is better at this point than Beasley than maybe you are correct but if not than it brings 3 more teams into play to potentially sign Beasley if he becomes a FA, i think moves like these by other teams will only drive up his price
