Another option? Lee Evans

Aven8

Well-Known Member
Messages
29,125
Reaction score
45,973
Ok, here is another option I just thought about. I know it's kind of like playing fantasy GM before the draft, but it's still a realistic thought.

With Ocho, and Boldin most likely off the market, and even though I'm still with Hostile and think the RW deal get's done. What do you guys think about the possibility of Lee Evans? He is in the final year of his contract as well. I know Buffalo needs receivers, but it's just a thought. Any team can be swayed. If we are looking for a compliment to TO like Jerry says, he would sure fit that mold....talk about a deep threat! Anyway, just another vet WR to keep an eye out for...I'm pretty certain I've heard nobody speak about him. Apparently they have has brief discussions about an extention, but that is about it. Here is a look of his career numbers:

Year G Rec. Yds Y/G Avg. TD
2004 16 48 843 52.7 17.6 9
2005 16 48 743 46.4 15.5 7
2006 16 82 1292 80.8 15.8 8
2007 16 55 849 53.1 15.4 5

Not great, but decent numbers. One of the best deep guys in the NFL. Also, consider that the Bills have not had a QB worth a crap his entire career. Although I do think Edwards is going to be a good one.

Another option to chew on for the next 4 days until we can get this thing going!
 

iceberg

rock music matters
Messages
34,404
Reaction score
7,932
better than crayton, not quite as good as glenn (unless he's gone of course) and certainly not a #1. it would depend on the price to be honest. even that i'd rather take my chances in the draft.
 

ajk23az

Through Pain Comes Clarity
Messages
7,953
Reaction score
422
I would like him, he has put up decent #'s with poor QBs around him.

But with that being said, Buffalo will re-sign him as they have more than enough room under the cap.
 

Chocolate Lab

Run-loving Dino
Messages
37,116
Reaction score
11,472
You don't think Lee Evans is a #1? :confused:

I think Evans would blow up if he had a QB worth a darn.

But I can't see Buffalo possibly letting him go.
 

iceberg

rock music matters
Messages
34,404
Reaction score
7,932
ajk23az;2044621 said:
I would like him, he has put up decent #'s with poor QBs around him.

But with that being said, Buffalo will re-sign him as they have more than enough room under the cap.

and are looking for wr's anyway as i understand it. doubt they'll let a decent #2 go very easily.
 

iceberg

rock music matters
Messages
34,404
Reaction score
7,932
Chocolate Lab;2044623 said:
You don't think Lee Evans is a #1? :confused:

I think Evans would blow up if he had a QB worth a darn.

But I can't see Buffalo possibly letting him go.

he's been pretty inconsistant overall. all qb? maybe. but after what, 4 years i'd put part of that back on him too. he's a good/decent #2, not sold on #1.
 

InmanRoshi

Zone Scribe
Messages
18,334
Reaction score
90
Buffalo is looking to add offensive weapons, not trade away one of the only ones they have.
 

joseephuss

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,041
Reaction score
6,920
iceberg;2044620 said:
better than crayton, not quite as good as glenn (unless he's gone of course) and certainly not a #1. it would depend on the price to be honest. even that i'd rather take my chances in the draft.

I would say he is as good as Glenn. Maybe better. He has 29 TDs over 4 years, which is 7.25 per season(1 TD every 8.03 receptions). Glenn has 44 TDs over 12 years, which is 3.67 per season(1 td every 13.48 receptions). Glenn's top season was 7 TDs and three other times with 6. Evans is a good threat.
 

DaBoys4Life

Benched
Messages
15,626
Reaction score
0
iceberg;2044620 said:
better than crayton, not quite as good as glenn (unless he's gone of course) and certainly not a #1. it would depend on the price to be honest. even that i'd rather take my chances in the draft.

hmmm have missed start in 4 years glenn starter every game in a season once in his career i would say the makes him better.
 

BrAinPaiNt

Mike Smith aka Backwoods Sexy
Staff member
Messages
78,654
Reaction score
43,000
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Aven8;2044615 said:
Ok, here is another option I just thought about. I know it's kind of like playing fantasy GM before the draft, but it's still a realistic thought.

With Ocho, and Boldin most likely off the market, and even though I'm still with Hostile and think the RW deal get's done. What do you guys think about the possibility of Lee Evans? He is in the final year of his contract as well. I know Buffalo needs receivers, but it's just a thought. Any team can be swayed. If we are looking for a compliment to TO like Jerry says, he would sure fit that mold....talk about a deep threat! Anyway, just another vet WR to keep an eye out for...I'm pretty certain I've heard nobody speak about him. Apparently they have has brief discussions about an extention, but that is about it. Here is a look of his career numbers:

Year G Rec. Yds Y/G Avg. TD
2004 16 48 843 52.7 17.6 9
2005 16 48 743 46.4 15.5 7
2006 16 82 1292 80.8 15.8 8
2007 16 55 849 53.1 15.4 5

Not great, but decent numbers. One of the best deep guys in the NFL. Also, consider that the Bills have not had a QB worth a crap his entire career. Although I do think Edwards is going to be a good one.

Another option to chew on for the next 4 days until we can get this thing going!

You answered your own question.:cool:
 

Valor

Benched
Messages
131
Reaction score
0
Pure fantasy land. The fact that the Bills are considering drafting a guy like Devin Thomas at #11 tells you they're in no position to ship away a young, talented wideout like Evans, who may be on the edge of stardom (provided their QB cooperates).
 

Aven8

Well-Known Member
Messages
29,125
Reaction score
45,973
Valor;2044701 said:
Pure fantasy land. The fact that the Bills are considering drafting a guy like Devin Thomas at #11 tells you they're in no position to ship away a young, talented wideout like Evans, who may be on the edge of stardom (provided their QB cooperates).

The same can be said for Boldin and we've been discussing him for months.
 

Hailmary

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,117
Reaction score
1,870
Forget about Evans. The only reason why Williams and Boldin are mentioned in trade talks is because they have guys on the other side who are or capable of being #1s. If the Bills lose Evans, you'll be asking Roscoe Parrish to be the #1. Not happening.
 

ZeroClub

just trying to get better
Messages
7,619
Reaction score
1
Chocolate Lab;2044623 said:
You don't think Lee Evans is a #1? :confused:

I think Evans would blow up if he had a QB worth a darn.

But I can't see Buffalo possibly letting him go.

I couldn't agree more, on all counts.

Evans is the real deal, but his QBs haven't been. When you draft a first round WR, Evans is exactly the kind of guy you hope you are getting.

Buffalo's price (if they listened at all) would be too high.
 

Valor

Benched
Messages
131
Reaction score
0
Aven8;2044705 said:
The same can be said for Bolden and we've been discussing him for months.

Those two receivers (and their respective teams) are hardly interchangeable. With Fitzgerald under contract, the Cards would be dealing from a position of strength. In Buffalo, it's Evans and a collection of nobodies. Why would they shed their only proven player at that position for a "what if" like Devin Thomas or any other receiver in this draft?
 

Wimbo

Active Member
Messages
4,133
Reaction score
3
InmanRoshi;2044633 said:
Buffalo is looking to add offensive weapons, not trade away one of the only ones they have.


bingo.jpg
 

Future

Intramural Legend
Messages
27,566
Reaction score
14,714
CrazyCowboy;2044693 said:
very good wr......he would bring the speed ....no doubt about that

Agreed, he would be the PERFECT fit across from TO
 

Eskimo

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,821
Reaction score
496
If he hits FA next year, we should consider trying to sign him. Bills may not want to franchise him given the cost of doing so.

His numbers seem pretty comparable to RW. He is an elite deep threat and we would need a possession receiver to work opposite him.
 

jobberone

Kane Ala
Messages
54,219
Reaction score
19,659
You can't buy it when its not for sale. And things not for sale cost too much.
 
Top