noshame said:Martz is a great OC but his offensive philosophy doesn't fit Parcells style of play
True, true, it involves scoring lots of points
noshame said:Martz is a great OC but his offensive philosophy doesn't fit Parcells style of play
True, true, it involves scoring lots of points
summerisfunner said:and abandoning the run
jem88 said:I'm certainly not one of those 'sign T.O. and every other high-profile player available' types, but I have to wonder why, when a coach with the offensive pedigree of Mike Martz is available, we're not making an effort to get him. It doesn't look like as if he's going to get a head coaching offer (please correct me if I'm wrong there), so it's pretty easy to imagine him coordinating someone's offence next year. As a head coach, I think he was a bit of a clown, but his offensive track record is superb, and he's achieved a lot of it with strong-armed QB who aren't necessarily that mobile (something we look to have for the next few years.)
noshame said:True, true, it involves scoring lots of points
CanadianCowboysFan said:Our WRs don't fall to the ground the minute they catch the ball unlike Holt and Bruce so Mutz is not a good choice.
Anyway, he has a heart problem, do you want to see him die on the sideline?
TwentyOne said:Guys you all just don't get it. Scoring TDs on every drive doesn't win you games. Controlling the clock does
Correct me if I'm wrong, but was he not in his first year on the job the year the Rams won?montgod said:And in addition to what everyone else stated in regards to Martz, I believe it would set the Boys back a lot since they would have to learn a whole new offense again. Yes, he is a good offensive mind, but wouldn't be a good fit at this time if the Boys are trying to make a SuperBowl run next year imo.
Followed Vermeil who set the table for him. Giving Martz credit for winning a super bowl is like giving Switzer the same credit.jem88 said:Correct me if I'm wrong, but was he not in his first year on the job the year the Rams won?
I think Martz the coodinator, with a head coach checking his impulsive urges, would be a lot more successful than Martz the head coach.
big dog cowboy said:Followed Vermeil who set the table for him. Giving Martz credit for winning a super bowl is like giving Switzer the same credit.
jem88 said:I'm certainly not one of those 'sign T.O. and every other high-profile player available' types, but I have to wonder why, when a coach with the offensive pedigree of Mike Martz is available, we're not making an effort to get him. It doesn't look like as if he's going to get a head coaching offer (please correct me if I'm wrong there), so it's pretty easy to imagine him coordinating someone's offence next year. As a head coach, I think he was a bit of a clown, but his offensive track record is superb, and he's achieved a lot of it with strong-armed QB who aren't necessarily that mobile (something we look to have for the next few years.)