Cowboy from New York
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 1,852
- Reaction score
- 236
He had some good moments this preseason. Hope we luck out and can bring him back after week or two when Burnett is healthy ray2: hopefully.
Yes Kalen (OLB) is on IR and Bruce (CB) was cut. I don't know it Bruce cleared waivers or not but I agree that he was a waste of a draft pick. Hopefully we just let him go.ghst187 said:Wasn't it BRUCE thorton that was waived rather than KALEN thorton?
I thought KALEN thorton went on IR.
If I'm the one mistaken I will be upset because I really liked KALEN thorton's potential. He was really bringing the heat, even if it was against 2nd stringers.
Bruce Thorton was a bust from the beginning and I knew that the second we drafted him. Hopefully we kept the RIGHT Thorton.
parchy said:Thornton is better than Reeves
abersonc said:Funny, why then does Reeves play and Thornton get cut? Thornton couldn't beat out Jones. I was surprised BP drafted him because he's more of a Jerry type pick - looks like a player but doesn't play like one.
abersonc said:Funny, why then does Reeves play and Thornton get cut? Thornton couldn't beat out Jones. I was surprised BP drafted him because he's more of a Jerry type pick - looks like a player but doesn't play like one.
parchy said:Thornton is better than Reeves
AdamJT13 said:Thornton is a better cornerback than either Reeves or Jones.
But Reeves and Jones are both better on special teams and as nickel/slot defenders, and they both can play nickel safety.
If Thornton was on our 53-man roster, he wouldn't be active on game days as long as Newman, Henry and Glenn all were healthy.
Alexander said:So, is Coach Parcells in the habit of just releasing "better" players?
So what makes either inferior to Thornton as cornerbacks? Care to qualify your statement?
People who do not watch the team on a day to day basis and are not football coaches feel fit to judge the decisions. If Thornton were indeed significantly better in any phase of his game, I don't think we would just expose him just because he cannot play special teams.
What we should be asking ourselves is why can't he play special teams, not sitting here and glibly stating that he is better than what we have.
I am very glad not a single poster in the cyberverse is in charge of this team.
Alexander said:I am very glad not a single poster in the cyberverse is in charge of this team.
AdamJT13 said:At cornerback, Thornton is better in coverage than Reeves at cornerback or Jones at cornerback (which he rarely plays anyway). Reeves, though, does have the physical tools to be better than Thornton. It's not a huge difference, but Thornton is/was better at cornerback. But he never would have even dressed for a game unless Newman, Henry or Glenn -- or maybe even two of the three -- were hurt.
Sure we would. NFL teams have to make sure they have the best combination of 45 players active on game days. A fourth cornerback who contributes little or nothing on special teams and doesn't have the ability to play other positions on defense IS NOT as valuable to a team as a fourth cornerback who plays special teams, plays in the slot and can play safety in a pinch. Even if we lose a little at the fourth cornerback spot by cutting Thornton, we came out ahead because of the contributions Reeves and Jones can make elsewhere.
Thornton didn't play much special teams in college and wasn't good at it here. In case you haven't noticed, Parcells insists that backup players be able to contribute on special teams. If they can't, they're not as useful as one who can.
I would have released Thornton, too, for the same reasons Parcells did.
Alexander said:Again, you have said nothing but opinion.
Thornton could not beat out either Reeves or Jones in last year's training camp, when this team was crying out for options at right cornerback. And that had nothing to do with a numbers game and who had more prowess on special teams.
I ask again, what makes Thornton a "better cornerback"?