KJJ
You Have an Axe to Grind
- Messages
- 62,512
- Reaction score
- 39,731
Hostile;3281057 said:Wrong as usual. I read your posts, laugh at how silly they are, dismiss most of it as babble, and lampoon the rest. And as I have already told you, I don't have a posse. I ride alone. They agree with me when I am right and disagree when I am wrong.
You read my posts to find things to twist simply to fit your agenda all because you're still licking your wounds after the Bennett debate that had you scrambling to lock the thread. LOL I made one simple comment that the Cowboys still have a ways to go after their 31 point thrashing at the hands of the Vikings and you twisted and turned it into something to fit your silly little agenda. I'll be leaving you dangling from another tree when this debates over. LOL
Hostile;3281057 said:I really don't understand how you can sit there in a haze and not look at what you are saying and realize it is just simply ignorant. Only the Dallas Cowboys are subject to these wild suppositions and babblings? Seriously? You're going to sit there and in all sobriety say yes? That every other team in the NFL is immune to the infection you have placed on the Cowboys?
How can you not see the ignorance of that? Honestly, it is sad.
Dude it's CLEAR you don't understand. LOL The only thing that's ignorant is how you keep claiming I'm saying things I never said because either you can't grasp what I'm saying or you're reading what you want into my comments to fit your agenda. The only one who's in a haze is you because my comments have been crystal clear to anyone who has the ability to comprehend. My comments haven't been strictly about the Cowboys but you have an agenda. I say one thing and you claim I'm saying another. LOL Give it up!
Hostile;3281057 said:These are called examples of how your "idea" just doesn't work in real life. In all honesty, it is really not that hard to figure out what I was doing. I am sorry that History and examples go right over your head. There is literally nothing I can do about that.
It's called diverting! It's a convenient way for you to change the subject when you have no answers. Once you get cornered you go in another direction. Your MO has become very clear. LOL
Hostile;3281057 said:Your suppositions just don't work when put to the acid test of History. Not just the 1990's either. The 2009 Dallas Cowboys proved that 44-6 in 2008 did not matter. It had no bearing on the team. There was no added pressure. Ultimately the 2010 Dallas Cowboys will once again prove that 34-3 has no bearing on the team. I have repeatedly shown you that these bad beatings do not matter. If you are still too blind to see it maybe you should install a window in your stomach.
Everything I've said history backs up you just keep twisting things up. I never said the 44-6 debacle in 08 against the Eagles would have a bearing on the 09 season. I never said the 34-3 butt whipping at the hands of the Vikings will have a bearing on the 2010 season. I simply said that defeat showed the Cowboys still have a ways to go to win a SB. The 44-6 loss to Philly with a playoff birth on the line in 08 showed the Cowboys had a ways to go to be a championship team. I'm not saying the Cowboys can't go farther in 2010 than they did last season or even reach the SB but they have to get BETTER if they're going to advance farther. They were 3 wins away from being champions this past season that's a WAYS to go...GET IT!
Hostile;3281057 said:No, I understood perfectly and used examples all from History to show that you had no earthly clue what you were babbling about.
You use examples from all history as a way of diverting. This has been proven! You do this in a desperate attempt to twist what I'm saying to fit your agenda. This is your MO!
Hostile;3281057 said:You've got no point. I am sorry to tell you that. You've got nothing. Zero, zip, nada. You're swinging at air, and missing. Donut, bagel, goose egg baby.
Just another way for you to divert when you have no answers. An easy way out. LOL
Hostile;3281057 said:Oh goody. Let's show you just how ridiculous your stance is using the team you just oozed praise all over. On December 6, 2009 the Vikings were in Arizona to play the Cardinals. They got beaten like ugly step children. Please look it up if you doubt this.
On December 20, 2010 they were in Carolina (Psst, not a good team) to play the Panthers, and once again they got worked. That day Carolina was the pimp and the Vikings were...well, you get the point. Or maybe not. Please look this up if you have doubts.
One week later on December 28, 2009 they were in Chicago (Psst, also not a good team) to play the Bears and lost in overtime. Please look this up if you just don't believe it.
So looky here. The Vikings faded down the stretch of the regular season, made it to the playoffs based solely on their early year easy schedule, and were able to deliver a beatdown on the Cowboys. By your standards of understanding this is impossible. Every detail of evidence you have pointed your fingers at the Cowboys and Tony Romo just got pointed at the Vikings and Brett Favre. They were better all year than the Cardinals, Panthers, and Bears. Yet they got beat by all three teams. You will probably say, "on the road." Psst, the Cowboys were on the road in Minnesota.
You're now trying to argue the Vikings weren't a better team than the Cowboys last season? You are one hell of a HOMER! LOL The Cardinals, Panthers and Bears didn't beat the Vikings in post season. The Saints lost 3 games in a row at the end of the season including losses to TB and Carolina big deal! All teams lose games in the regular season but you have to look at the season as a whole. In the end it's how you play in the playoffs. During the regular season the Cowboys laid an egg against a struggling Packers team that was virtually on life support and that win gave the Packers new life. The Cowboys lost twice to a Giants team that ended up 8-8 and was MAULED by the Vikings 44-7 in the season finale. The Vikings had home field advantage because they finished with a better record than the Cowboys. The Vikings PASTED the Cowboys 34-3 in the playoffs and you think the Cowboys had the better team last year? You're saying I'm ignorant?
Hostile;3281057 said:This is merely a repeat of the question above. The answer remains No. Pressure is always going to exist. Especially for a team like the Cowboys. In the real world down there on that field the only pressure they feel is from the other team. On that day the Vikings applied plenty of pressure. They won.
But it is so silly to think that Dallas losing that game adds nearly insurmountable pressure for 2010. Such a fairy tale.
I never said losing to the Vikings would add insurmountable pressure for 2010. That's just more of the same BS from you. The Cowboys got over the insurmountable pressure last season by finally ending their 13 year winless playoff drought. It's when a team reaches a particular point and can't get over the hump that the pressure mounts.
Hostile;3281057 said:In football, that's the game we're talking about in case you can't follow along, that stuff happens. Great teams and players like Tom Brady and the Patriots come up against a team that is inferior and they get beat. Sometimes they get beat badly. Like the Vikings you think were so superior all year to the Cowboys got beat 3 times in 4 games down the stretch by inferior teams.
Did those beatings matter? Please try not to dance around that question. I know that you simply don't understand when I use examples from NFL History to refute your silly little suppositions, but this one should be easy to follow. Your stance is that a big loss proves a team "has a long ways to go." But I have repeatedly now shown you that in the real world that is not the case. Have you learned nothing from the 44-6 chants that the mouth breathers spewed that now sound as hollow as a bongo drum?
I can follow along just fine as long as you stick with the topic and stop diverting to mislead everyone. LOL Professional football players feel pressure and some players choke. This is a FACT! Romo and McNabb have choked plenty of times in pressure situations. Favre folded against Saints in the end. He's folded plenty of times that's why he only has one ring in 19 years. Any expert will tell you that professional athletes choke on occasion. They're living breathing human beings like anyone else and they feel pressure to perform. Certain positions like the QB position carry alot of pressure because big games almost always come down to the QB having to make a play to win the game. For you to say professional athletes don't fold shows how little you know about professional sports football in particular. Sorry but football players are not immune to pressure. When you have a team who's won only one playoff game in 13 years and a QB who keeps turning the ball over in big games which helps lead to lopsided losses that team has a ways to go before they'll ever be holding a Lombardi trophy at the end of the season. No run along and read what you want into what I said to fit your tiring agenda and follow it up with another long LONG babbling post that no one including your posse will care to read.