jazzcat22
Staff member
- Messages
- 84,070
- Reaction score
- 106,440
They have talent, trade a few players.hell no, we're giving away next years capital

They have talent, trade a few players.hell no, we're giving away next years capital
Your 1st mistake, following PFF.Comparing all of the Cowboys draft picks against each other...
Worst PFF rating:
5th round pick which Cowboys traded up to get :
LB Shemar James: 59.6 PFF rating
SMH...
https://www.pff.com/nfl/players/shemar-james/157749/draft-profile
2nd Worst PFF rating:
1st round pick which the Cowboys selected very early with their 12th overall pick:
OG Tyler Booker: 66.5
Ouch...
https://www.pff.com/nfl/players/shemar-james/157749/draft-profile
3rd Worst PFF rating:
7th round draft pick:
DT Jay Toia: 69.0
https://www.pff.com/nfl/players/jay-toia/146406/draft-profile
Everyone else had a PFF rating of 72 or higher.
An A+ overall grade?![]()
True but our experts on hear will soon start calling all of them a bust before the first OTA.We won’t know the grade for this draft for 2-3 years.
They were serious, just not to some fans liking.Imagine how much more interested we'd be right now if we were actually serious in FA over the last two seasons.
If Mel would to change his hairstyle he would know better, and give us an A.Kiper gave us a B.
They were a playoff team 3 years in a row. They were considered a playoff team, and possible NFCE winners going into 2024 season.But are the Cowboys a playoff team now? Same front office, new head coach. The jury is out. I can concede the draft was good, but I believe it will take multiple good drafts to overcome the lousy decisions from the front office in 2024.
There’s two types of fans here. The type that start anointing players and penciling them in as starters in April and the type that are already claiming they suck.True but our experts on hear will soon start calling all of them a bust before the first OTA.
I'm not interested in the perception others have for the team, only actual achievement by the Cowboys. They failed in the playoffs three years in a row and then let too much talent get away without appropriately replacing it. Then came the back breaker... injuries that they couldn't overcome.They were a playoff team 3 years in a row. They were considered a playoff team, and possible NFCE winners going into 2024 season.
Injuries derailed that.
I can see why some will not have them as a playoff team this season. Because so many injury issues of some of the starters.
However, some of them will be back as well. So I can see why they will be considered a playoff contender this year.
Not a contender to win the NFCE, but to sneak in as a WC team.
Some will never be happy no matter what we do. It's the Jerry effect and when you factor in the cherry on top which was the all in crap last year, a large chunk of our fans won't ever give a passing grade to anything we do. I get it, I really do. For me, I don't operate like that. I live in the now. We had a good weekend.
I don't like PFF. They are a joke.Your 1st mistake, following PFF.
Your 2nd mistake, you don't like anything about this team.
Here is some more proof of me slowly changing my mind...Your 1st mistake, following PFF.
Your 2nd mistake, you don't like anything about this team.
You're right; just to the dismay of the fans who don't want to be mediocre.They were serious, just not to some fans liking.
Dont sleep on PFF now....Its far from a perfect science and they certainly have some misses, but their grading model is fairly consistent and they review every play. That alone carries some value.Your 1st mistake, following PFF.
Your 2nd mistake, you don't like anything about this team.
Their grading model is flawed. It is only as good as the programming.Dont sleep on PFF now....Its far from a perfect science and they certainly have some misses, but their grading model is fairly consistent and they review every play. That alone carries some value.
What info is biased against Dallas? I certainly have noticed some scheme and play style issues that dock certain guys unfairly, but still they are probably 80% or so accurate which is incredible for the volume they do. Excellent starting point when doing a player evaluation IMO.Their grading model is flawed. It is only as good as the programming.
Someone input bias info against Dallas.
![]()
I was joking about it. I don’t really care about rankings.What info is biased against Dallas? I certainly have noticed some scheme and play style issues that dock certain guys unfairly, but still they are probably 80% or so accurate which is incredible for the volume they do. Excellent starting point when doing a player evaluation IMO.