Twitter: Archer: Parsons top rated defensive player on board

blueblood70

Well-Known Member
Messages
40,969
Reaction score
28,153
So he confirmed their ability to evaluate defensive personnel is questionable at best. Got it.
actually draft experts before and after the draft confirmed this..period

umm no albeit debatable most are saying hes possibly the best defensive player in the draft..not even close to Paye..sorry not our board, THE NFL Board

Even SAS said it s very good pick and he was impressed. Seriously SAS

you know better then Fish i doubt that even..fans are as from experts as you can get from this process..
 

Toruk_Makto

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,242
Reaction score
17,336
they say this all the time. These are the same people who said claiborne was the closest corner they have seen to deion. Every year its the same thing in the spring. everyone is amazing, they can never believe player x was available when they picked and of course the player x was the top player on our board.

yet this never correlates to actual winning. They just took a linebacker at 12 in the first round because the other first round linebacker who they couldn't believe was there a few years ago has a chronic neck issue just like his draft report said. They used a 2nd rounder pick on a guy with a serious injury who has never been right and has an ego maybe bigger than anyone who has ever played here.

So they have used a top 50 pick for the third time in 5 years to fill the same position. The first two had issues that ended up happening and now they have taken yet another guy with a questionable background. And to think they wouldn't resign a good player and a good person in anthony hitchens because they thought he couldn't stay healthy...now he is a super bowl champion.

so no its not astrophysics its basic math and the front office keeps failing the same test.
You can be wrong about a player and have them rated highly.

Claiborne went where he was expected to go.

This isn't astrophysics.
 
Top