it matters. I want the 2 gap under.[/MEDIA]
4-3 vs. 3-4 doesn't matter.
No it doesn't. It's 10-15 plays a game, and the number of snaps where the differences between those alignments matters is probably less than half of that.it matters. I want the 2 gap under.
No, it's the Seattle 4-3 over and 4-3 under base (plus Bear) which looks a lot like a 3-4. Then primarily nickel 4-2.
The NT and 5T/DE will actually 2-gap which is what really makes it different than what we've seen here.
Exactly. It's not new but for some reason, your average Cowboys football fan doesn't seem to be familiar with this scheme.No, it's the Seattle 4-3 over and 4-3 under base (plus Bear) which looks a lot like a 3-4. Then primarily nickel 4-2.
The NT and 5T/DE will actually 2-gap which is what really makes it different than what we've seen here.
Parsons on the edge and bohannon at NT? Plus all the DEs they got are the proto DE with 34+ arms. This class reminds me of Ware, Spears, and Canty.
We all have to understand DLaw is not going to get a lot of sacks in the defense. That doesn’t mean he’s not going to be productive though.
Why would you think that?
The LDE is going to two gap. Similar to a 3-4 DE. He can't just pin his ears back and get after the QB.
We'll see, I think they'll switch it up, but I except to see 1 gap fronts that will give him opportunities.
You're right. He won't only two gap. My original point was for the people who only judge productivity on sack numbers.