big dog cowboy;5065740 said:Williams will be on this team for a long time. That can't be said about one of our starters in recent years. Miles replacement might have been drafted tonight.
NextGenBoys;5065747 said:Obviously. But why draft Escobar in the 2nd if we're going to be running 3 wide sets?
And if we're going to be running 12 personnel, why draft Williams in the 3rd, especially when you have Dwayne Harris who really impressed last year, as well as Coale Beasley, who fills a much needed void with some wiggle underneath coverage.
I just don't like what we've done in this draft very much.
big dog cowboy;5065732 said:It's all about being being better in the red zone.
TheRomoSexual;5065756 said:I'm really stunned as to why people seem so fixated on Harris. I mean, he's fine for a 3rd or 4th WR, but he's nothing special. Williams has the chance to be quite special.
Austin will likely be gone next season. Our starting base set will be 12 with Witten, Escobar, Dez, and Williams. Several big targets who can catch.
Dale;5065765 said:It's a valid point. Hanna is a nice prospect but doesn't scream red zone. Witten is a potential HOFer, but he isn't much of a red-zone threat.
The face value of the Escobar pick was laughable due to taking another tight end, but he does have the potential to add a dimension to our offense that we lacked. Be it attacking the seam, down on the goal line, creating mismatches by lining up at different spots on the field. Garrett just has to show he knows how to use him. Not trying to sound trite, but that's my concern at this point. Will it be non-utilized talent?
TheRomoSexual;5065756 said:I'm really stunned as to why people seem so fixated on Harris. I mean, he's fine for a 3rd or 4th WR, but he's nothing special. Williams has the chance to be quite special.
Austin will likely be gone next season. Our starting base set will be 12 with Witten, Escobar, Dez, and Williams. Several big targets who can catch.
stasheroo;5065773 said:I remember back when we had both Roy Williams and Martellus Bennett. They were big, tall guys too. And those traits were never utilized either.
NextGenBoys;5065780 said:Harris played very well in nearly all of his opportunities last year and earned more PT.
NextGenBoys;5065747 said:Obviously. But why draft Escobar in the 2nd if we're going to be running 3 wide sets?
And if we're going to be running 12 personnel, why draft Williams in the 3rd, especially when you have Dwayne Harris who really impressed last year, as well as Coale Beasley, who fills a much needed void with some wiggle underneath coverage.
I just don't like what we've done in this draft very much.
stasheroo;5065751 said:This will be attempt #3 to run the two TE offense.
New England has been able to do it, but thus far Dallas has wasted two 2nd round draft picks on backup TE's.
I hope this isn't #3...
TheCount;5065680 said:If running a NE offense means having two TE's on the field, then sure. We are running a NE offense. However, I am not in favor of taking Harris (a proven playmaker) off the field in favor of a rookie TE that hasn't played a snap of NFL football.
I'm also not sure what this means for Hanna, and I loved Hanna's athletic upside.
The fact of the matter is that we've had multiple 2nd round TE's here and not a single one ended up being involved in the offense in any major way. Why, suddenly, this would change is beyond me.
This is what I was thinking. Maybe Hanna will get some use as an H-back.erod;5065706 said:Yes. There won't be a fullback on the team next year.
Aven8;5065826 said:It's not the players IMO. It's the OC.