percyhoward
Research Tool
- Messages
- 17,062
- Reaction score
- 21,861
It's a six-game stretch.A single game...c'mon.
Dallas Defense NFL rank, per drive
Games 13-18
yards 30th
scores 30th
(most) punts 31st
TD 24th
opp passer rating 22nd
It's a six-game stretch.A single game...c'mon.
It's a six-game stretch.
Dallas Defense NFL rank, per drive
Games 13-18
yards 30th
scores 30th
(most) punts 31st
TD 24th
opp passer rating 22nd
How is the defense immensely more talented? You add LVE but you lost a healthy Sean Lee for most of the year.
You added a full year of Gregory. That's it.
You're literally making things up.
And core stats are immaterial. Stopping people from scoring is most important. And when you consider a different slate of opponents looking at counting stats is silly.
The fact of the matter is that this defense went from 25th to 9th. Claiming Richards is overrated with that backdrop is a freaking joke and fan malpractice.
Nobody looks at the stat you’re pulling up. People care about turnovers and points. Acting like points given up and turnovers is no a fair comparasion is irrational.
Buffalo has the second ranked DVOA...they were 18th in scoring defense, 16th in rush defense and 30th in 3rd down defense. Denver has the fifth ranked DVOA..they’re 13th ranked scoring defense, 20th ranked passing defense and 19th ranked rushing defense. Sorry that stat is flawed. Give me the team that limits points and yards over the duration of a season.
This is simply an elementary way to look at a unit. Who did Buffalo play? How many top offenses? Did they play the same teams we did? Or Denver did?
We are smart enough to look beyond counting stats. DVOA takes into account the opposing teams that were played.
Looking simply at turnovers, sacks and points allowed is really a rudimentary way to evaluate a defense.Okay you can look at that stat if you would like. I think a culmative analysis is more accurate with the parity in the NFL. I do believe the majority of fans care about turnovers, sacks and points the most. Those are the stats I used. They aren’t obsolete and nor did I make up anything.
Looking simply at turnovers, sacks and points allowed is really a rudimentary way to evaluate a defense.
We should and more importantly CAN do better.
I don't think these are the same thing at all.Agree.
I want to point out another flaw I perceive in DVOA.
Do you think that certain wins should count more than others?
For example, the Steelers had one of the toughest schedules in the league, they even beat the Patriots down the stretch. They missed the playoffs by a half a game as I’m sure you know.
On the other hand, then Colts had the second easiest schedule in the NFL. They finished 10-6 securing the last wildcard spot. Should their wins have less weight since they were generally against bad teams?
Seems like the exact same premise of DVOA. You judge more on a per game basis based on competition and not the culmative total.
It's a six-game stretch.
Dallas Defense NFL rank, per drive
Games 13-18
yards 30th
scores 30th
(most) punts 31st
TD 24th
opp passer rating 22nd
***2017 PPG: 20.35
2018 PPG: 21.4
2017 Interceptions: 10
2018 Interceptions: 9
2017 sacks: 38
2019 sacks: 39
****In the 2017 number I subtracted 28 points that were the result of a pick 6.
Something to discuss...are we letting a young, firey coach blind us to the fact that this defense statistically isn’t much different? That playoff performance was as bad as I have seen in the Marinelli era...maybe the worse. Richard calls the plays.
Remember...he was fired from a staff that many of us envy and the Seahawks defense is no worse for it.
Marinelli loves DLine stunts more than any coach I've even seen.
The Rams said they knew when the DLine was going to stunt and exploited it.
A DB coach that morphed into the pseudo D-Coordinator can't work magic in 1 season. He was NOT the actual D-Coordinator.
Thats the clicker there sometimes older coaches get caught up withAdd this to that look:
For one, in two of the last three regular season games, Dallas gave up 178 yards to the Colts and 143 to the Giants. Only the Carolina Panthers in week one had more than than either of those two teams prior to that.
Something was starting to leak. That something was apparently on tape for anyone with two week’s time to prepare to see.
According to Danny Heifetz with TheRinger.com, offensive linemen Austin Blythe and John Sullivan noticed that the Cowboys defensive line put tells on tape that made them quite easy to block.
https://thelandryhat.com/2019/01/15/two-reasons-dallas-cowboys-season-died/3/
Agree.
I want to point out another flaw I perceive in DVOA.
Do you think that certain wins should count more than others?
For example, the Steelers had one of the toughest schedules in the league, they even beat the Patriots down the stretch. They missed the playoffs by a half a game as I’m sure you know.
On the other hand, then Colts had the second easiest schedule in the NFL. They finished 10-6 securing the last wildcard spot. Should their wins have less weight since they were generally against bad teams?
Seems like the exact same premise of DVOA. You judge more on a per game basis based on competition and not the culmative total.
***2017 PPG: 20.35
2018 PPG: 21.4
2017 Interceptions: 10
2018 Interceptions: 9
2017 sacks: 38
2019 sacks: 39
****In the 2017 number I subtracted 28 points that were the result of a pick 6.
Something to discuss...are we letting a young, firey coach blind us to the fact that this defense statistically isn’t much different? That playoff performance was as bad as I have seen in the Marinelli era...maybe the worse. Richard calls the plays.
Remember...he was fired from a staff that many of us envy and the Seahawks defense is no worse for it.
Become a Tampa fan. Maybe some of the so called "fans" will change their tune.I think it's safe to say there are many things overrated when
it concerns the current state of affairs that is today's Dallas Cowboys.