Arkansas definately got screwed

[Bob Sacamano]

lol at referees being trained in logic

I bet they teach them algorithms in NFL, referee school

 

[theogt]

You can say it all you want but it's simply untrue. You don't know if the DB new where the ball was or not. He was clearly turning to make a play. That's the fact of the matter. Sorry.

I can say with absolute certainty that the DB didn't know where the ball was because it's physically impossible for him to know where the ball was.

The WR reached around the DB. The DB didn't initiate contact with a hand on the chest.

Not true. The DB put his hands on the WR's chest. That is the DB initiating the contact.

Just like it was clear to the official across the field that it was clear the PF call was correct but the official right on top of the play understood their was no foul. OK gotcha.

Wait, I thought you were the one who wanted to claim that if the referee thinks it is or isn't a foul, that must be evidence that it is or isn't a foul?

Now you want to reverse course and claim the opposite? A flip-flopper? Whoddathunkit?

Laugh it up but you know what they say. If your the only one laugh, the joke is probably on you.

Oh wait, let me guess. You don't see how it's so obviouse to you and nobody else seems to get it. Never heard that before.

This is about the 5th time you've spelled the word "obvious" with an "e" -- you do realize that's not correct don't you? I can write the dozens of other misspellings off as lack of attention to details and fat fingers causing typos, but when you continually misspell the same word, I have to question whether you really even know how to spell the word.

Yes, because every discussion with Theo is logical.

It is on my end. Wish I could say the same for others.

Last resort to a desperate arguement. Convince yourself that we can't possibly be right because we are all inferrior. What's this new concept you call Logic?

I'm not resorting to anything. You've shown in your attempts at discussing the logic that you don't understand how logic applies is the case of applying rules to facts. It's not an easy thing to do, which is why not just anyone can be a referee, judge, or lawyer.

Of course Theo. Of course your right.

Thanks for the confirmation, but I knew already.

OK Theo.

 

[theogt]

lol at referees being trained in logic

I bet they teach them algorithms in NFL, referee school

Thanks for the input, Mr. GED.

 

[ABQCOWBOY]

I can say with absolute certainty that the DB didn't know where the ball was because it's physically impossible for him to know where the ball was.

Not true. The DB put his hands on the WR's chest. That is the DB initiating the contact.

Wait, I thought you were the one who wanted to claim that if the referee thinks it is or isn't a foul, that must be evidence that it is or isn't a foul?

Now you want to reverse course and claim the opposite? A flip-flopper? Whoddathunkit?






This is about the 5th time you've spelled the word "obvious" with an "e" -- you do realize that's not correct don't you? I can write the dozens of other misspellings off as lack of attention to details and fat fingers causing typos, but when you continually misspell the same word, I have to question whether you really even know how to spell the word.

It is on my end. Wish I could say the same for others.

I'm not resorting to anything. You've shown in your attempts at discussing the logic that you don't understand how logic applies is the case of applying rules to facts. It's not an easy thing to do, which is why not just anyone can be a referee, judge, or lawyer.

Thanks for the confirmation, but I knew already.

Your supposed to raise the white flag before you spew your BS Theo.