Article: Goodell would give indemnification to Walsh for materials from Pats' days

Dallas

Old bulletproof tiger
Messages
11,515
Reaction score
3
Espn.Com
Chris Mortenson


NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell said Wednesday at the Pro Bowl that the NFL is willing to give former Patriots video assistant Matt Walsh legal indemnification for any information and materials he would provide to the league regarding his work with the Patriots.

Goodell also said Wednesday he's willing to pursue any believable information in the Spygate case, but he simply doesn't know if any exists.
League attorneys are working with an attorney for Walsh to get an agreement in place for Walsh to meet with league officials.

In general legal terms, indemnity is a guarantee against any loss which another might suffer, often financially.

Walsh, who is now a golf pro in Maui, did video work for the Patriots when they won their first Super Bowl after the 2001 season, and was not interviewed as part of the NFL's investigation into New England illegally taping opposing coaches in the last two years.

"If there is new information that is credible, new material that could be credible that would help us," Goodell said, "yes, we'll look at it.
"We've had people come to us over the last six months with material that we pursued and it didn't lead to anything."

Among the things the league wants to talk to Walsh about is a recent Boston Herald report that a member of the Patriots' video staff taped the St. Louis Rams' pregame walk-through before Super Bowl XXXVI.

"We were aware of this before," Goodell said. "We pursued it and weren't able to get any information that was credible. We were aware of some of the rumors and we pursued some of them and we continue that. From Day 1, I said if we feel there is new information that's inconsistent with what we've been told [by the Patriots], I reserve the right to reopen it.

"The staffs are talking about making sure [Walsh] has the ability to talk and what information he might have."

Goodell also said on Wednesday he had no firm date as to when he would meet with Sen. Arlen Specter, but Goodell said it would be next week.

Specter questioned the thoroughness of the NFL's investigation that led to a $500,000 fine for coach Bill Belichick, a $250,000 fine for the Patriots organization, and the loss of this year's first-round draft pick. Specter also wondered why Goodell had the six tapes turned over by the Patriots destroyed, along with notes the team gave Goodell.

Goodell spoke during the AFC team practice for the Pro Bowl. He was asked if the league received any information about other teams taping opposing coaches' signals.

"We had and pursued it and found nothing credible," Goodell said.
Asked why the Patriots turned over six tapes, he replied: "That's what they had. My guess is they taped over some of those from time to time ... their notes were reflective of that."

Taping over previous video is not unusual for NFL teams.
"We asked for all the tapes and anything that could've been done that was inconsistent with our policy," he added.

Goodell also mentioned a possible rotation of sites for the Pro Bowl. Honolulu has it on Sunday and again next February. After that, the NFL has no agreements with any venue.

"I think that's viable," he said of a rotation, "and that's an alternative, obviously. Hawaii is important to us and has been great to us."
He also said staging the Pro Bowl the week before the Super Bowl -- without Super Bowl participants, of course -- was a consideration. Any such change would require approval from the NFL Players Association.

Goodell also mingled with several players, spending about 10 minutes talking to Ravens safety Ed Reed, then chatting with Peyton Manning and Derek Anderson before heading back to league headquarters in New York.
Chris Mortensen covers the NFL for ESPN. Information from The Associated Press was used in this report.
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
Hmm...this smells like a ploy. If you're willing to give him indemnity, just do it. Why make the negotiations public? I think he's just setting himself up to say, "Look, we gave him what he wanted and he couldn't come up with anything."
 

Beast_from_East

Well-Known Member
Messages
30,142
Reaction score
27,232
theogt;1945860 said:
Hmm...this smells like a ploy. If you're willing to give him indemnity, just do it. Why make the negotiations public? I think he's just setting himself up to say, "Look, we gave him what he wanted and he couldn't come up with anything."

While I totally believe that the Pats taped the Rams before the SB, I highly doubt this guy has "a smoking gun".

He would have dropped that puppy to a major network already.

I believe any real evidence has already been destroyed.:mad:
 

Vertigo_17

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,278
Reaction score
56
Beast_from_East;1945880 said:
While I totally believe that the Pats taped the Rams before the SB, I highly doubt this guy has "a smoking gun".

He would have dropped that puppy to a major network already.

I believe any real evidence has already been destroyed.:mad:

I agree, don't expect any real evidence...just heresay.
 

peplaw06

That Guy
Messages
13,699
Reaction score
413
If he says that he did it, that's not hearsay.

I know it will turn into a "he said, she said" kind of thing, but i think Walsh is going to have instant credibility. The Pats have already been caught taping other teams signals. If Walsh testifies that he taped the Rams or whatever, there's already evidence there that backs him up in a sense.
 

FuzzyLumpkins

The Boognish
Messages
36,574
Reaction score
27,859
theogt;1945860 said:
Hmm...this smells like a ploy. If you're willing to give him indemnity, just do it. Why make the negotiations public? I think he's just setting himself up to say, "Look, we gave him what he wanted and he couldn't come up with anything."

Either that or the Pats are applying pressure themselves which is just about as likely given what we know of the situation.
 

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,965
Reaction score
37,488
I just love how Godell is now saying that they have always been pursuing the issue of Spy-gate. Now all of the sudden, good old Roger is saying that they were active in keeping the possibility of the Patriots cheating open, but nobody came up with any credible evidence.

Sure Roger....

Maybe you need to ban yourself and play poker with Pacman Jones and Michael Vick during your self-imposed suspension...
 

BAT

Mr. Fixit
Messages
19,443
Reaction score
15,607
Pro bowl before the SB will not fly.


The best players would have even greater reason not to participate.
 

peplaw06

That Guy
Messages
13,699
Reaction score
413
khiladi;1945942 said:
I just love how Godell is now saying that they have always been pursuing the issue of Spy-gate. Now all of the sudden, good old Roger is saying that they were active in keeping the possibility of the Patriots cheating open, but nobody came up with any credible evidence.

Sure Roger....

Maybe you need to ban yourself and play poker with Pacman Jones and Michael Vick during your self-imposed suspension...

No kidding. They were "thorough" in their investigation, but didn't interview the guy who was in their video department in the recent past? Why don't I believe that?
 

TellerMorrow34

BraveHeartFan
Messages
28,358
Reaction score
5,076
BAT;1945945 said:
Pro bowl before the SB will not fly.


The best players would have even greater reason not to participate.

Exactly. If the Pro Bowl happens before the Superbowl you can forget about even more of the better players sitting out.

Well I guess that depends on how soon before the Superbowl. If it were the week before then no one playing in the Superbowl would be there.
 

LandryFan

Proud Native Texan, USMC-1972-79, USN-1983-2000
Messages
7,400
Reaction score
6,347
Goodell also said Wednesday he's willing to pursue any believable information in the Spygate case, but he simply doesn't know if any exists.

It doesn't after YOU DESTROYED IT!
 

Rack

Federal Agent
Messages
23,906
Reaction score
3,106
CrazyCowboy;1946168 said:
Seems this commish is always doing and saying the right things......

What alternate reality do you live in?
 

Bill Wooten

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,091
Reaction score
1,309
I still can't believe the Pats only turned over 6 tapes and Goodell accepted that.

You would have to be an absolute moron to accept their word that they "re-used" the tapes.

If this were a real investigation, then this statement would have never been issued.

"We asked for all the tapes and anything that could've been done that was inconsistent with our policy," he added.

Instead, NFL personnel would have shown up at the door and gone through all of their video to determine what was inconsistent with their policy.

This is a joke.
 

tyke1doe

Well-Known Member
Messages
54,312
Reaction score
32,716
Goodell said:
"We were aware of this before," Goodell said. "We pursued it and weren't able to get any information that was credible. We were aware of some of the rumors and we pursued some of them and we continue that. From Day 1, I said if we feel there is new information that's inconsistent with what we've been told [by the Patriots], I reserve the right to reopen it.

I remember him saying this too.
This was never a closed case.
If the new allegations prove to have validity, then the case will continue. If not, it will remain closed but pending until additional information surfaces.
 

tyke1doe

Well-Known Member
Messages
54,312
Reaction score
32,716
Bill Wooten;1946182 said:
I still can't believe the Pats only turned over 6 tapes and Goodell accepted that.

You would have to be an absolute moron to accept their word that they "re-used" the tapes.

If this were a real investigation, then this statement would have never been issued.

"We asked for all the tapes and anything that could've been done that was inconsistent with our policy," he added.

Instead, NFL personnel would have shown up at the door and gone through all of their video to determine what was inconsistent with their policy.

This is a joke.

If it were a bogus investigation, then his comments about reopening the case never would have been offered either.

It goes both ways, depending on what you want to believe in this matter.
 
Top