Article: High Expectations in Dallas: Go Big or Go Home

NextGenBoys

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,252
Reaction score
1,964
Here is an article that I have published on BleacherReport.com. Thoughts and comments are always welcome.

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/...n-dallas-for-2009-go-big-or-go-home/show_full


High Expectations in Dallas for 2009: Go Big or Go Home


It is said that everything is bigger in Texas.

Owner and General Manager Jerry Jones is set to open the largest and most luxurious stadium in the NFL this upcoming season. The Dallas Cowboys have the largest fan base across the nation, and America’s Team also holds the number one ranking for dollar value of all NFL teams.

However when it comes to the Cowboys performance on a football field, they are falling short of living up to the “bigger” role that Texas upholds. Moderately sized may be an accurate description. In 2009 however, the Cowboys season must be bigger. Much bigger. Lombardi big.

December 28, 1996 is just another date to most. It was three days after Christmas, and four days before the start of 1997. On the surface there doesn’t seem to be any real significance to this date for most people. However, fans of the Dallas Cowboys (and quite possibly their numerous detractors) may remember this date. This was the last time the Dallas Cowboys have come out of a playoff game with a win.

After falling short (with different coaches and Pro-Bowl packed rosters) to make any real noise in December and January, the time is now for the Dallas Cowboys. Fresh off the most disappointing season in franchise history, the Cowboys rid themselves of Terrell Owens, Tank Johnson, and Adam Jones in an attempt to improve team chemistry and get back into the playoffs.

Losing to Seattle and New York in the 2006 and 2007 playoffs made many Cowboys determined to come out in 2008 and embark on a Super Bowl journey. Dallas flew out of the gates with a 3-0 start, with many pundits penciling Dallas in as the NFC representative in the Super Bowl. The wheels would eventually fall off, as Dallas went 9-7 and missed the playoffs altogether.

Dallas is no longer a Super Bowl favorite for the NFC amongst many analysts. Perhaps it is due to the monumental failure that is the 2008 season. Or maybe it is due to not having Terrell Owens. With the release of Owens, many critics have tried to suggest that Dallas does not have the firepower at wide receiver to compete for a Super Bowl.

One thing is certain. Wide receivers do not win championships. It didn’t work out very well for Larry Fitzgerald. Or for Randy Moss. Or hey, that Terrell Owens guy.

What does bring home championships, is defense.

If Dallas can play strong defense and they do not turn the ball over, the 2009 season has the potential to end with a Super Bowl victory - regardless of Owens absence. This is all assuming that the team comes together as one unit.

Dallas had 59 sacks in 2008 which led the NFL, including league-leader DeMarcus Ware notching an impressive 20 sacks. Dallas also did a good job at holding their opponents to 294.5 yards per game and allowing a 36% conversion rate on third down, both eighth in the league.

However they failed to take the ball away from their opponents as they forced a mere 22 turnovers, with only seven teams forcing less. Their turnover margin stood at -11, which was second worst in the league. The offense surely did not help matters as they threw 20 interceptions and lost 13 fumbles.

With the team losing former starting defensive end Chris Canty to the rival New York Giants, Zach Thomas moving on to Kansas City, and with the team trading cornerback Anthony Henry to Detroit, Dallas is losing several starters on defense that they must be able to overcome. Dallas also lost linebacker Kevin Burnett, who was a main contributor in the nickel defense.

The team is confident in Mike Jenkins and Orlando Scandrick to fill the void at corner after solid rookie campaigns from both. They also added defensive end Igor Olshansky and middle linebacker Keith Brooking in free agency, who both are familiar with head coach Wade Phillips from their days with him in San Diego and Atlanta. Both have experienced career bests during their years under the tutelage of Phillips.

With Phillips taking over defensive coordinator duties midway through the season, the results were immediate. Dallas forced 15 of their 22 turnovers in the nine games Phillips was in control of the defense, and also brought down the quarterback 38 times out of their 59 sacks. There is no reason to believe that the defense will not continue to succeed. With seven returning starters, and more than ample players replacing the former starters, there could be the makings of a potentially devastating defense in Big D.

In order to do so, Pro-Bowler Terrence Newman, and fellow corners Jenkins and Scandrick must be able to create turnovers, and Ken Hamlin must improve on a poor outing in 2008. Ware must continue to wreak havoc on opposing quarterbacks, and the rest of the linebacker crew must tackle well and get to the quarterback when asked to, in order to take pressure off of Ware. Jay Ratliff must continue to disrupt offenses up the middle and Marcus Spears and newcomer Olshanksy must control the line of scrimmage, and make a play or two when called upon.

However if the offense cannot operate well, a dominating defense can only take a team so far.

A revolving door at left guard, a season ending injury to remarkable rookie Felix Jones, and a broken pinkie finger on Tony Romo contributed to the Cowboys inefficient offense in 2008. They also lost Marion Barber and Miles Austin for extended time. Injuries were a clear hindrance to the offense.

However that is no excuse with the talent that Dallas has on the offensive side of the ball. They must perform better in 2009, and everything will depend on how the offensive line plays. If they can protect Romo and open up running lanes, this will help drastically in cutting down on turnovers, and of course creating opportunities to score. While Romo will always be a risk-taker, one would have to think that he has learned from his mistakes turning the ball over after this past season.

A healthy offensive line and an apparent shift in game style may make the offense more efficient. The days are gone of a receiver complaining about opportunities after a loss in which he was targeted 17 times. A balanced game plan with an emphasis on getting their tremendous trio of running backs Barber, Jones, and Tashard Choice involved more is expected to be the focus.

The Cowboys also have Jason Witten, arguably the best overall tight end in football, and second year tight end Martellus Bennett has the athleticism that rivals that of Antonio Gates. Patrick Crayton is a dependable slot receiver, and Dallas is very high on the potential and development of Miles Austin. Austin has the most speed and the ability to stretch the field of any receiver, and would be a great compliment to Roy Williams. Williams has to answer questions after a poor performance in 2008 partially due to playing with plantar fasciitis, a condition of inflammation in the foot.

First and foremost, Dallas must get the job done up front, but more importantly they must not turn the ball over. If Dallas can protect the ball, there is no doubt that they will move the ball, given they can stay relatively healthy, unlike 2008. If Romo is able to spread the ball around to the depth and talent around him, and the if the trio of running backs are able to get some room to operate, the offense can rival the production of the 2007 season.

With an efficient offense and a devastating defense, the Cowboys will have a recipe for success to challenge for a Super Bowl. After all, this style of football won the Cowboys three Super Bowls in the 1990’s, when the Cowboys were setting the standard for what is bigger in Texas; the Cowboys talent and execution on a football field. Lately however, the Cowboys performance cannot be classified as such.

The Dallas Cowboys better start to go big, or they should go home
 

silverbear

Semi-Official Loose Cannon
Messages
24,195
Reaction score
25
It's a hell of a lot better than the other article from Bleacher Report I've read in the past few hours, LOL... it's optimistic, but not homeristic...
 

birdwells1

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,837
Reaction score
4,074
One thing is certain. Wide receivers do not win championships. It didn’t work out very well for Larry Fitzgerald. Or for Randy Moss. Or hey, that Te
rrell Owens guy.


Lost me here, Moss and Fitz's team's were in the lead in the SB (the SB) until the last drives. It's not like they're teams didn't make the playoffs.
 

jday

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,321
Reaction score
13,284
birdwells1;2767482 said:
One thing is certain. Wide receivers do not win championships. It didn’t work out very well for Larry Fitzgerald. Or for Randy Moss. Or hey, that Te
rrell Owens guy.


Lost me here, Moss and Fitz's team's were in the lead in the SB (the SB) until the last drives. It's not like they're teams didn't make the playoffs.
I think the overall point here is if you look back over the history of Super Bowl winning teams, T.O.-esque receivers weren't always on the roster. And it becomes less of necessity if you have viable weapons at each receiving target position (e.g. WR/TE/RB).

Witten and Bennett likely form the best duo of TE's in the league. Barber, Felix, and Choice are likely the best trio of RB's in the league. Roy Williams is unproven, but I believe with him being healthy and on the same page as Romo, will, at least, have a 1000+ yd season. Austin, Crayton, Hurd, Johnson, Stanback, and Ogletree - some where in there is a solid #2 and #3 receiver. The big question for our offense, IMO, is if our OL can be consistent throughout the year and the playoffs and can stay healthy.
 

Rampage

Benched
Messages
24,117
Reaction score
2
birdwells1;2767482 said:
One thing is certain. Wide receivers do not win championships. It didn’t work out very well for Larry Fitzgerald. Or for Randy Moss. Or hey, that Te
rrell Owens guy.


Lost me here, Moss and Fitz's team's were in the lead in the SB (the SB) until the last drives. It's not like they're teams didn't make the playoffs.
Larry is on another level above Moss and Owens. Moss and Owens can get taken out of playoff games. Last year in his 1st postseason he broke 3 Jerry Rice postseason records #1 most receptions in one postseason(30) #2 most receiving yards in one postseason(546) and most receiving tds in one post season(7). for that Larry Fitzgerald is in a class all by himself right now above every wr.
 

arync

New Member
Messages
671
Reaction score
1
this is an honest assessment of the team. I wish most of the media would look at the team without putting their opinions in the articles
 

Alexander

What's it going to be then, eh?
Messages
62,482
Reaction score
67,294
With the release of Owens, many critics have tried to suggest that Dallas does not have the firepower at wide receiver to compete for a Super Bowl.
This is short-sighted. We have yet to show the mental toughness (from the players to the staff) to compete for a Super Bowl. That's the problem.
 

Oh_Canada

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,083
Reaction score
4,222
birdwells1;2767482 said:
One thing is certain. Wide receivers do not win championships. It didn’t work out very well for Larry Fitzgerald. Or for Randy Moss. Or hey, that Te
rrell Owens guy.


Lost me here, Moss and Fitz's team's were in the lead in the SB (the SB) until the last drives. It's not like they're teams didn't make the playoffs.

Yeah, I don't get it either. No one says defense doesn't win championships, but elite wideouts do make a difference and those two players mentioned happen to play on pretty good teams. It could be argued the Ravens might have beaten the Steelers had they had a game breaking wr instead of a bunch of number three's and Gmen could have repeated had there superstar wr kept his gun in the car.
 

TellerMorrow34

BraveHeartFan
Messages
28,358
Reaction score
5,076
A WR like Larry might not be enough to win the Superbowl for them, your defense has to show up in crunch time, but take Larry off that team in the playoffs and Arizona doesn't even get by the Falcons in the opening round.
 

NextGenBoys

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,252
Reaction score
1,964
Alexander;2767608 said:
This is short-sighted. We have yet to show the mental toughness (from the players to the staff) to compete for a Super Bowl. That's the problem.

Agree 100% with that...but I didnt want to dive into a whole different tangent.
 

NextGenBoys

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,252
Reaction score
1,964
BraveHeartFan;2767655 said:
A WR like Larry might not be enough to win the Superbowl for them, your defense has to show up in crunch time, but take Larry off that team in the playoffs and Arizona doesn't even get by the Falcons in the opening round.

No question Arizona doesnt make any noise without Fitz.

But my point is, teams with high caliber wide recievers and average defenses win far less Super Bowls than teams with stout defenses and efficient offenses.
 

EPL0c0

The Funcooker
Messages
8,054
Reaction score
3,811
Aren't expectations in Dallas always BIG/higher every season?

Isn't that what makes playing in Dallas so difficult (among other things); that they're expected to win and compete for a SB EVERY year? I don't see teams like the Saints, Texans, even Patriots carrying that kind of burden
 

Boyzmamacita

CowBabe Up!!!
Messages
29,047
Reaction score
64,100
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
EPL0c0;2767754 said:
Aren't expectations in Dallas always BIG/higher every season?

Isn't that what makes playing in Dallas so difficult (among other things); that they're expected to win and compete for a SB EVERY year? I don't see teams like the Saints, Texans, even Patriots carrying that kind of burden

This is a point that gets lost on a lot of people. It has got to be easier to focus when the whole world isn't constantly saying Super Bowl or bust. The Cowboys don't get to just play football like other teams. On the other hand, it makes success that much sweeter. We just haven't had much lately.
 

NextGenBoys

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,252
Reaction score
1,964
EPL0c0;2767754 said:
Aren't expectations in Dallas always BIG/higher every season?

Isn't that what makes playing in Dallas so difficult (among other things); that they're expected to win and compete for a SB EVERY year? I don't see teams like the Saints, Texans, even Patriots carrying that kind of burden

Well if you want to nitpick, yes they are high every season.

But this has been a doom and gloom offseason with many thinking the window is closing on us. I do not believe that. I think it is still wide open.

And to say the Patriots do not carry the burden of high expectations, you may want to re-assess what the Patriots have done as of late.
 

Alexander

What's it going to be then, eh?
Messages
62,482
Reaction score
67,294
NextGenBoys;2767707 said:
Agree 100% with that...but I didnt want to dive into a whole different tangent.

But you should.

This team and organization simply doesn't have that edge. It isn't a fact that we have it and just haven't seen the results. I don't believe it is there. I really don't. It starts at the top and bleeds down. We are just missing that psychological edge. We see it make us stumble every year. The more intense the game, the more likely we are to wilt.
 

jobberone

Kane Ala
Messages
54,219
Reaction score
19,659
Alexander;2768863 said:
But you should.

This team and organization simply doesn't have that edge. It isn't a fact that we have it and just haven't seen the results. I don't believe it is there. I really don't. It starts at the top and bleeds down. We are just missing that psychological edge. We see it make us stumble every year. The more intense the game, the more likely we are to wilt.

Well, I have to begrudgingly give you this up to a degree. I think the reasons for losing are multifactorial including injuries, lack of depth, inexperience, overconfidence, coaching and even talent at critical areas.

They need to learn how to win big games though.
 

jobberone

Kane Ala
Messages
54,219
Reaction score
19,659
BTW, Fitz is not as good as Moss was at his best. But he's not far away and may prove greater. Look for Moss to rebound with Brady back.
 

Alexander

What's it going to be then, eh?
Messages
62,482
Reaction score
67,294
jobberone;2768868 said:
Well, I have to begrudgingly give you this up to a degree. I think the reasons for losing are multifactorial including injuries, lack of depth, inexperience, overconfidence, coaching and even talent at critical areas.

They need to learn how to win big games though.

I think the staff needs to learn how to win big games just as much as the players. Specifically, I don't think our head coach has an earthly idea how that's accomplished.
 

Bleu Star

Bye Felicia!
Messages
33,925
Reaction score
19,920
NextGenBoys;2767386 said:
High Expectations in Dallas for 2009: Go Big or Go Home

Here we go again... :rolleyes:

Every single year... For once I would like to be the team that comes out of nowhere ans surprises everyone. This current batch of core players has shown me that they aren't very good at living up to lofty expectations... Hopefully the FA infusion and the large draft class can change the overall mindset of those that have consistently underwhelmed for years now. It is what it is I guess.

1 oz Media Hype
1 oz Current core Boys players
2 Tbsps Current clown coaches

There's your recipe for Falling Shortcake. Enjoy it.
 

EPL0c0

The Funcooker
Messages
8,054
Reaction score
3,811
Boyzmamacita;2767769 said:
This is a point that gets lost on a lot of people. It has got to be easier to focus when the whole world isn't constantly saying Super Bowl or bust. The Cowboys don't get to just play football like other teams. On the other hand, it makes success that much sweeter. We just haven't had much lately.
Y'know the expectations are gonna be 100ox higher this year because of you know who and the fact that *HE* hisn't here to blame for poor play...
 
Top