utrunner07
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 9,326
- Reaction score
- 262
Hostile;1877960 said:
yeah...you are right it was 500 guys not 100 guys...my apologies. And I am the one stuck in the past? LOL...kind of contradict yourself don't you?
As long as nobody interviews T.O., Romo or Witten, we're OK
- Thread starter AMERICAS_FAN
- Start date
yeah...you are right it was 500 guys not 100 guys...my apologies. And I am the one stuck in the past? LOL...kind of contradict yourself don't you?
utrunner07
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 9,326
- Reaction score
- 262
yeah of course.1fisher;1878136 said:no.... it's having a good memory.....
zeromaster
New Member
- Messages
- 2,575
- Reaction score
- 0
At first glance, I thought the OP meant media interviews, but then the drugs kicked in.
Just boosting my post count...
Just boosting my post count...
Hostile
The Duke
- Messages
- 119,565
- Reaction score
- 4,544
I should apologize for having a good memory? Good luck with that.utrunner07;1878097 said:
I didn't bring up the 500 guys thing. I haven't in a couple of years. Care to guess why? No, never mind, I will tell you. I moved on and quit living in the past.
That doesn't mean I get amnesia and forget everything, but I damn sure don't dwell on it.
utrunner07
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 9,326
- Reaction score
- 262
Hostile;1878232 said:
Oh ok. I see now you make since. So just so I know for the future what is the time limit on bringing up things from the past? 2 years, 3 years? I mean even though its applicable to this situation in that the coach of a team is very important obviously it is not ok to bring up something about the past concerning the situation. So please enlighten me so that I won't make such a terrible mistake again in the future....[/sarcasm off]
Billy Bullocks
Active Member
- Messages
- 4,098
- Reaction score
- 22
I think a huge part of this team looking so much more potent on offense is generally the change in attitude of the coaching.
Parcells played games not to lose. Keep your cards close to your vest. Lot's of running for ball controll. Defensively he didn't gamble with exotic blitz packages as much. It had been mentioned on here many times before, but Parcells favored his players winning individual matchups as his strategy for success.
When you look at the way Wade Phillips coaches defense as opposed to Parcells, you can see how it also affects their offensive decisions. Parcells would gamble on 4th down. But if we had a lead, he would protect it, rather than take shots downfield, etc. I think the offense is just opened up more in certain situations.
Parcells played games not to lose. Keep your cards close to your vest. Lot's of running for ball controll. Defensively he didn't gamble with exotic blitz packages as much. It had been mentioned on here many times before, but Parcells favored his players winning individual matchups as his strategy for success.
When you look at the way Wade Phillips coaches defense as opposed to Parcells, you can see how it also affects their offensive decisions. Parcells would gamble on 4th down. But if we had a lead, he would protect it, rather than take shots downfield, etc. I think the offense is just opened up more in certain situations.
utrunner07
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 9,326
- Reaction score
- 262
Hostile;1878440 said:
Well Im done arguing with you, obviously I had no right in bringing up a similar situation from the past that might have some relevance for today's team...what was I thinking...
Dave_in-NC
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 17,049
- Reaction score
- 5,132
utrunner07;1878097 said:
If this team wins the SB, the new improved Jerry will knock it down to any one of a hundred could coach this team.
