dre1614;1285257 said:Most said, its because teams have figured out how to contain him in the pocket. One guy said he has no worries about Tony, and later said he is confident he will reduce those turnovers.
Surprising 2 of them said we beat Seattle this week.
theogt;1285287 said:The idea that teams have figured out Romo by "keeping him in the pocket" is one of the dumbest memes that's been picked up by the media in a long time.
Oh, and despite teams figuring him out, he's posted 110+ QB ratings in 2 of his last 3 performances.
what 2 guys picked dallas?dre1614;1285257 said:Most said, its because teams have figured out how to contain him in the pocket. One guy said he has no worries about Tony, and later said he is confident he will reduce those turnovers.
Surprising 2 of them said we beat Seattle this week.
Jimz31;1285332 said:Let's not forget that the coaching staff has put the burden of winning the game squarely on Romo's shoulders. How much have we run in the month of december as opposed to passing? And this is his first year starting.
It's more like the coaching staff goes into panic mode the second we get behind....even in the first quarter. This has to change.
bigbadroy;1285331 said:what 2 guys picked dallas?
Jimz31;1285332 said:Let's not forget that the coaching staff has put the burden of winning the game squarely on Romo's shoulders. How much have we run in the month of december as opposed to passing? And this is his first year starting.
It's more like the coaching staff goes into panic mode the second we get behind....even in the first quarter. This has to change.
Mr Cowboy;1285434 said:Everyone is harping on Romo's interception and fumbles. But he did bring us back to lead the game when we were down 13-0, then TNew brought us back from 20-13, and Romo brought us back to lead when we were behind 30-24.
In the past month, the way the defense has been playing, Tony knows that he has to make plays and score because we will fall farther behind .
Yeah, his turnovers hurt, but how about the interceptions that Roy and Henry dropped in the end zone, or the fumbled punt by Newman that led to the score right before the half. Reverse any of those plays and we're not talking about Romo. BTW Romo was not the one who made Kitna look like Joe Montana.
Re-watch the game.....I did earlier today.
theogt;1285287 said:The idea that teams have figured out Romo by "keeping him in the pocket" is one of the dumbest memes that's been picked up by the media in a long time.
Oh, and despite teams figuring him out, he's posted 110+ QB ratings in 2 of his last 3 performances.
The fumbles were mistakes on his part, sure, but what does this have to do with teams figuring out Romo?Cowchips;1285610 said:Only because the QB Rating doesn't take forced errors like fumbles and bad decisions into account. Those 110+ would be more like 40's if a fumble or stupide decision counted against the QB like an interception does. A QB that hands 17 points to an opponent like Detroit and then posts a 110 rating demonstrate what a complete joke the QB rating is.
Jimz31;1285535 said:Dude, I agree with you. I think Romo is the LEAST of our problems. I think the only reason the game was close was because of him
At most 13 points were, but I would argue 10.Cowchips;1285619 said:Yes, and when you consider that 17 of Detroit's points were the direct result of Romo's errors, this statment makes even more sense :shootme:
theogt;1285618 said:The fumbles were mistakes on his part, sure, but what does this have to do with teams figuring out Romo?
The QB rating measures production. If teams have been "figuring him out" he wouldn't have been producing those types of stats.
Cowchips;1285624 said:His errors produced 17 points for Detroit. Does he get credit for those too or do we lay that on the defense and give Romo a pass??