That remains to be seen.Doomsday101;2653101 said:In the end the draft was pretty successful.
Double Trouble;2653108 said:That remains to be seen.
Double Trouble;2653108 said:That remains to be seen.
BrAinPaiNt;2652868 said:I don't want Lacewell anywhere near jerry around draft time.
cowboyjoe;2653365 said:Now what alot of you dont know is this, and i didnt find it out later till about 7 years ago. But jerry jones did offer tom landry another position on the dallas cowboys team, just not head coach. Tom Landry turned that down. And yes, I know that from a former person that was on the board of the dallas cowboys, till later when jerry jones bought up his stock on the team.
So, jerry jones reallizing that he messed up firing tom landry, but should have let tom landry ride off into the sunset, and tom maybe should have done what landry said he wanted to do one time after being head coach. Landry said he wanted to be the head scout for scouting the opposing teams, break down those teams and report to the cowboys.
Then, when you hear that jerry jones said he probably fired gailey too soon.
Now at the same time, the players and coaches have to be gotten onto. The players have to just shut up and play, and quit their griping and complaining. No more excuses, shut up and play.
Yet, coaches like jason garrett must put together a better game plan, wade shouldnt have to wait till end of season to make changes. Like in the special teams department, or on the defensive side, when wade had to take over the defense. THERE SHOULD BE NO MORE EXCUSES, DO YOUR JOB COACHES AND PLAYERS, AND QUIT THE GRIPING AND SAYING EVERYTHING IS OK. YOU HAD IT EASY PLAYERS WITH NO HITTING IN PRACTICES FOR FIRST 25 DAYS LAST YEAR, TIME TO PUT UP OR SHUT UP.
Alexander;2653430 said:He hates getting onto coaches, you know?
Don't worry about your cognitive delay over me having sarcastically made that up with Lacewell wanting to be a head coach. By the way, I really admire people who are open about their afflictions and strive to overcome them.Alexander;2652893 said:So to you, "getting on the coaches" means what--control?
To me, "getting on" the coaches has nothing to do with this. To me the extreme negative psychological characterizations of Jerry Jones do come into question if indeed he is reluctant to correct his coaches.
Emasculation is not the same thing as disciplining or staying on top of them like any effective manager. If you don't have the fortitude to keep your coaches in line then how can you be so controlling in nature. A controlling personality is one that is aggressive, focused, determined and has little fear of confrontation to make employees accountable or effect change.
Obviously, in your zeal to defend him, you lost focus of whatever primitive point you were trying to make. Primitive point, eh. So why don't you just come out and state I am a neanderthal. Don't hide behind your double word hard consonant fairy dust.
Liking to do something and feeling compelled to do it are completely separate things. Oh sure from a generalistic standpoint you can competently state that. But when you put that in the context of running this professional franchise your perspective does not apply. Your differentiation of "liking to do something" versus "compelled to do so" has no place in a high stakes performance environment of "having to do so".
No "hater" would ever accuse Jones of allowing the coaches to "control" him. Of course not, I was being facetious, if not sarcastic.
Oh look. Here is that agenda thing again. LOL That is not only nebulous but weak and by the way never laugh at your own joke, it lessens the impact.
And who exactly is saying Lacewell "wants to coach". Oh, you just made that up. I understand now.