It's a bank. People try to get into the bank sometimes. You know, to get their money out and talk to bankers, tellers and stuff.
Thank bank manager told the detective that he didn't identify himself properly. That he was acting strange. Funny, because I act strange all the time. And if someone asks me my name and I say, "Scooby Doo", that's not illegal!
The man didn't identify himself to the detective. If he's not under suspicion of a crime, that's not illegal either. At least not to the degree of the death penalty.
He was probably scared he might shoot him in the back.
It doesn't really matter. When he's not breaking any law, he has the right not to talk to police. The detective should have and could have called police, who have tasers and mace, things like that to use. So it's not necessary to use a firearm. You get the point.
I'm not certain there was a "scuffle". That's the detective's story. And I've noticed many times that detectives and cops are very prone to lie.
Unsure. But it's irrelevant because even was being detained, legally, for suspicion of a crime, it's still not necessary to shoot him in the back. The truth is, he wasn't being detained and he wasn't under suspicion for any crime, so he should have been left alone.
The fact is you're going to believe what you want to believe because you're apt to believe the police cover ups, er, uh, I mean "investigations".
