nyc;1445561 said:I don't like Brad Sham. I think we see what I call "The Ragu Effect" with Brad Sham and most Cowboys fans. If all you have ever had was Ragu spaghetti sauce, then you will think Ragu is good never having tried a truly good sauce. (I find this all the time with Hotel reviews on Trip Advisor)
I find Brad Sham bland and boring. I think he is a very nice guy and I like him as a person, but I don't like him as the Cowboys announcer.
theebs;1445569 said:great thanks for sharing.
Never had ragu, I am from a mostly italian neighborhood in ny. So no ragu for me.
theebs;1445569 said:Never had ragu, I am from a mostly italian neighborhood in ny. So no ragu for me.
WoodysGirl;1445602 said:IMO. I'm not sure what more you can expect from him.
Rangers uke:nyc;1445605 said:Evocation of Excitment. Watch replay of Texas Ranger games on HSN when Mark Holtz was calling the games.
nyc;1445561 said:I don't like Brad Sham. I think we see what I call "The Ragu Effect" with Brad Sham and most Cowboys fans. If all you have ever had was Ragu spaghetti sauce, then you will think Ragu is good never having tried a truly good sauce. (I find this all the time with Hotel reviews on Trip Advisor)
I find Brad Sham bland and boring. I think he is a very nice guy and I like him as a person, but I don't like him as the Cowboys announcer.
theebs;1445549 said:Great news. The guy is one of the best analysts in the country. Him and brad are great togther.
I have been waiting to hear this for a while now, and I am very happy babe is back.
WoodysGirl;1445622 said:Rangers uke:
I don't have HSN, but I'm not sure Rangers would be my choice of viewing.
And really, don't you think Baseball announcers have to do more to make the game exciting?
abersonc;1445628 said:It isn't so much the Ragu effect as simply having a certain voice paired with something you like over and over again.
Ragu sucks -- I can't believe people buy that crap. Why not just put ketchup on your pasta?
cleverusername;1445637 said:Nooooooooooooooo.....:shootme:
At one time he was ok. I actually liked him, but with each passing year he becomes more arrogant and annoying. He must have gotten bit by the
Hanson bug.
Then it's just a matter of personal preference. I think he's pretty decent, but then I'm not one to care about the added sauce effect. Meaning don't drown me with that extra display of excitement. If I'm listening to the game, then I just want to hear the game, because more than likely it's because I can't catch it on TV.nyc;1445653 said:This could be true for some I guess, but I spent 30 years in Texas listening to the Cowboys and I never liked Brad Sham.
And that's why the Charlie Waters thing didn't work. I didn't sense there was any real chemistry between them. He's a much better writer than radio personality. I hope he continues to write articles for DC.com next year.Chocolate Lab;1445656 said:I used to think that, too, and then Waters replaced him and I gained a new appreciation for Babe.
Really, this is great news. Yeah, Babe sometimes thinks he's a genius for predicting that Parcells would call a draw on 2nd and 12 (my dog knows that, Babe) but he is a perceptive commentator. And he has good chemistry with Sham, IMO. Brad really seems to respect him.
Chocolate Lab;1445656 said:I used to think that, too, and then Waters replaced him and I gained a new appreciation for Babe.