Grier has the tools, no doubt, but that doesn't mean he could be the lead dog in the NFL. It'd be interesting to see though.If Dak goes down I would hope Grier absolutely kills it and never gives up the starting position again.
Or we tank for a chance to draft a top QB.
you nailed it . The goat came in as a back up and won 6 super bowls and played in 9 and still going, same for the others you mentioned. Dak is not that important for this team . Grier can win . Saw him during his college career , and we saw him last night. During practice the analysts were raving about him.
Guy was a natural winner in college.
I’d love to see Grier with the number one offense. Until we do it’s hard for me to say if he could, or couldn’t, help this team win multiple games if Dak had a significant injury.
when dalton took over the cowboys under dak were already like 1-4 or 2-3 ( and were losing against the Giants when Dak got hurt) and the OL never rallied behind Dalton . he never had a chance . Heck, against washington the OL abandoned him . lot of politics, bad coachinging and dak loyalists . team went nowhere. With the right coaching staff,. a back up QB can be very effective and win super bowls like. Warner. Brady , Foles etc.Andy Dalton was the best backup QB the Cowboys have had since Romo. But it didn't really matter and didn't save the season 2 years ago. Backup QBs usually don't win you games, but can lose you games. All you can expect is for them to protect the ball and just do enough to keep the defense honest.
So for these reasons I'm not too concerned with backup QB at the moment.
I agree if Dak goes down we are cooked.From a purely playing standpoint if Dak gets injured, I can't get worked up over it.
Neither Rush or Grier would give us a snowball's chance in Hell of being relevant.
I hope the coaches keep the guy that will be the most help getting Dak ready to play each week.
I suspect that would mean Cooper Rush would be the choice.
There aren't enough good starting QBs in the NFL much less backups. Keep the guy that can help make Dak better and more productive week in and week out.
Totally false . Throughout the history of the nfl , Backups can be very important . Heck , the eagles won a super bowl with a back up and beat the great New England with Brady and all , just a few years ago . How soon we forget . Not to mention Dak is not a great QB as we have seen .
Totally false . Throughout the history of the nfl , Backups can be very important . Heck , the eagles won a super bowl with a back up and beat the great New England with Brady and all , just a few years ago . How soon we forget . Not to mention Dak is not a great QB as we have seen .
I see this comment a lot, and I find it completely off base.From a purely playing standpoint if Dak gets injured, I can't get worked up over it.
Neither Rush or Grier would give us a snowball's chance in Hell of being relevant.
I hope the coaches keep the guy that will be the most help getting Dak ready to play each week.
I suspect that would mean Cooper Rush would be the choice.
There aren't enough good starting QBs in the NFL much less backups. Keep the guy that can help make Dak better and more productive week in and week out.
true if season ending injury, but normal would be 1 or 2 games. They would need to win at least 1 of those.What's sad? We have to rely on the Oline to protect Dak.
I believe you took what the OP meant the wrong way. With the backups Dallas currently has (meaning they're absolutely horrible) it doesn't matter being the season will be over should any of the two have to take over.
I wouldn’t mind seeing Grier if Dak were to go down. He has upside. Rush is what he is, serviceable. Grier could actually win if he develops.