Dak doesn't get hurt so no need for a backup QB. In fact, Dallas should just carry 1 QB.......Dak....... and save a roster spot.
It’s pretty clear that the team is “all in” this year and are going to make a hard run at the SB based on all their offseason moves.
Any ideas on what to do at backup QB though? I know Dak has been pretty healthy but if he goes down, who’s taking us to win the title? I really doubt Rush and Denucci (sp) are the answers. I’d rather have a veteran presence back there but I don’t see any FAs either (Newton wants to start.) I sure hope McClay and company have a plan..
......except for the Eagles game we were told that the reason he couldn't generate a single TD was because his shoulder was just being held together by a single tendon
Funny, not ha ha funny, I remember the Cowboys saying he was playing with a bruised shoulder and then I remember fans SPECULATING all sorts of things. I've never heard from any actual Cowboys source that said Prescott shoulder injury was because "his shoulder was just being held together by a single tendon" either before or after the game. He must have done just the greatest recovery of such a serious injury you say he had because in just ONE week later throw for 303 yards and 4 TD's.
.
It was merely a torn rotator cuff and torn labrum that hampered Dakota in that Playoff deciding game against the Eagles. The following week it was completely healed enough for him to put up those numbers against the mighty Commanders defense.........hes a gamer against stiff competition
Thats why hes the 40 million dollar man
It was merely a torn rotator cuff and torn labrum that hampered Dakota in that Playoff deciding game against the Eagles. The following week it was completely healed enough for him to put up those numbers against the mighty Commanders defense.........hes a gamer against stiff competition
Thats why hes the 40 million dollar man
How many wins did Aikman get when Emmitt & the running game didn't show up?
vs Philly (loss)
Dak 25/44, 265 yds, 0 td.
Zeke 13-47 yds, 0 td.
Pollard 2-0 yds.
Team: 16-54 yds.
vs Commanders (win)
Dak 23/33, 303 yds, 4 td's.
Zeke 18-122 yds, 1 td.
Pollard 14-60 yds.
Team: 36-223 yds.
Since we're on a trip down memory lane, How many wins were Brady and Marino able to get with NO running game whatsoever?
They will rue the day they give Rayne Dakota 40 Million a year
Odds are no team in the league does.We have ok QBs for a game or two during the regular season. Let's say Dak gets a concussion. We don't have a Nick Foles or Bernie Cosar to come in and save the day.
Did he missed the game? And no the entire team quit on Garrett. Just compare both eagles game and you will see the difference.......except for the Eagles game we were told that the reason he couldn't generate a single TD was because his shoulder was just being held together by a single tendon
I myself think Rush will do fine. You have to remember when you see him in preseason games what kind of talent is surrounding him. Plus,....he is fully cooked now. Has more experience on an NFL team.
Building a roster isn’t just about spendingIf they were all in they would have kept Byron, among others. The cost of the players we let go dwarfs the cost of the ones we brought on.
Our big spend was Cooper, but that was baked into the cake the moment we traded a 1st for him.
I see us spending about as we had last year. No big splashes in free agency. We're still building through the draft. And wow, that worked out this year.
https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/free-agents/dallas-cowboys/
Did he missed the game? And no the entire team quit on Garrett. Just compare both eagles game and you will see the difference.
That game wasn't for the playoffs or for the division. Not only that but you are forgetting that the entire team quit on Garrett. I get it though, you Dak hater clowns love to talk about what he couldn't do on certain games this season because the team quitting on Garrett gives you ammo for you're agenda. Dak has beaten very good teams and in very tough places, so this act that he couldn't score is silly. Even last season y'all won't even talk about the first eagles game........ remind everybody the score in that one.He should have stayed out which would have been best for the team, but there was a contract to be had at any cost.
I guess 1 TD was too much to ask for in a playoff deciding game.
That game wasn't for the playoffs or for the division. Not only that but you are forgetting that the entire team quit on Garrett. I get it though, you Dak hater clowns love to talk about what he couldn't do on certain games this season because the team quitting on Garrett gives you ammo for you're agenda. Dak has beaten very good teams and in very tough places, so this act that he couldn't score is silly. Even last season y'all won't even talk about the first eagles game........ remind everybody the score in that one.
Cooper Rush >>> Super Bowl Champion QBThe veteran QB's still out there are QB;s who once were starters but lost their jobs for various reasons and yet yet there are some here that suggest that the Cowboys sign one of them so if something happens to Prescott they could come in and prove why they were not starters anymore.
Maybe just maybe the current coaching staff has reviewed the film of Rush in preseason games and practices and decided that they will still go with him. Personally I haven't seen enough of him to make an educated guess on that, but I still regard what professional coaches think over what fans think.
.
Would have clinched for Dallas but that game didn't decide the division. Week 17 did, you're the one rewriting history trying to say week 16 was a playoff game...... that's false.First off, no reason for name calling and insults, so no reason for you have to come at me like this
Secondly, it was for the division unless we were to believe that the Eagle were gonna lose to the Giants the following week,They didn't.
A win against the Eagles would have clinched the NFC East......lets not rewrite history
The Cowboys held the tie breaker in their hands and the 40 Million dollar man couldn't generate a single TD.
