Boyzmamacita;2778473 said:
LOL I didn't say
I would prefer him over Romo. Not you, but some of these guys seems to think I said that. What I did say is that many (maybe I should have said some) in the league would consider Rodgers over Romo. The reaction by some is that I was nuts to say that. Fair enough, but again, it;s not that I'm saying i would do that.
Anyway, Rodgers has started one season...here are the comps for 2008...
I'll bold out who was better in each stat if you were an unbiased observer:
....................Romo......Rodgers
Age ................29 ........
25.5
Yards passing .3448.....
4038
Passing TDs .....26 ........
28
Ints ...............14 ........
13
QB rating .......91.4......
93.8
Comp % .........61% ......
63.6%
Yard rushing ....41 ........
207
TDs rushing ......0 .........
4
Fumbles lost .....7 .........
2
Many of those
total figures (TDs, ints, fumbles, yards) would be higher for Tony if he had played 16 games. But in 2008, it looks like Rodgers produced more in ALL areas of the game. The point is, the idea is not so far fetched unless you are a Cowboys fan...which I am.
Next question.