Barring injury, Dak’s gonna have a great year

[Nav22]

Why do you get so hung up on Daks ranking is beyond explanation, you have to be his brotha, or extremely brain dead.

Awww, someone's still butt-hurt because I hurt his feelings like a month ago.

I'm sorry. I'll try not to make you feel like an uneducated dolt in the future.

 

[blueblood70]

I'm going to assume this post is about asking how the weather is where I'm at.

Hot and humid! 45% chance of afternoon t-storms!

Said like any other person who lost a debate sorry I didn't share your narrative and I won't I bring facts and proof and data and all you bring is hyperbole and false narratives exaggerations and nonsense but it's 107 here with 109 heat index.. i'm an HVAC contractor taking a break, so??

served

 

[CowboysLakerBamaFan]

Said like any other person who lost a debate sorry I didn't share your narrative and I won't I bring facts and proof and data and all you bring is hyperbole and false narratives exaggerations and nonsense but it's 107 here with 109 heat index.. i'm an HVAC contractor taking a break, so??

served

Hey...a post shorter than War and Peace!

You're trainable afterall!

 

[CowboyRoy]

No, they wouldn’t do it for Lamar either.. I can guarantee you every defense in the NFL, including Dallas, fears Lamar more than they do Dak and by a long shot.

Fear his running. Definitely not his passing.

Lamar you need a specific type of offense and personnel to be successful. Dak can run nearly any type of offense an OC would want with his abilities. I bet there are many that would take Dak.

 

[Typhus]

Awww, someone's still butt-hurt because I hurt his feelings like a month ago.

I'm sorry. I'll try not to make you feel like an uneducated dolt in the future.

You should start a poll on who the bigger moron is.

 

[khiladi]

Fear his running. Definitely not his passing.

Lamar you need a specific type of offense and personnel to be successful. Dak can run nearly any type of offense an OC would want with his abilities. I bet there are many that would take Dak.

Lamar’s arm is a thousand times better than Dak and he flings it with a flick of the wrist, while Dak’s mechanics are slow. Lamar can throw from the pocket too. His earlier weakness was throwing outside the numbers which happened in the Titans game and their defense was beast anyways those playoffs. But Lamar is a great passer. He also threw 36 TDs in year 2 on 491 attempts while Dak took 7 years to hit 37 on 596 attempts.

Dak hasn’t shown any ability to play in any offense. He can’t even do a traditional 3-5-7 drop back ftom center.





https://www.baltimoreravens.com/news/busting-myth-that-lamar-jackson-struggles-passing-situations

 

[Typhus]

You should start a poll on who the bigger moron is.

Awww, someone's still butt-hurt because I hurt his feelings like a month ago.

I'm sorry. I'll try not to make you feel like an uneducated dolt in the future.

Put up or shut up, no account bet here just a forum approved poll.

 

[CWR]

	TEAM	SEASON	GP	REC	W%	W	L	T	TD	PTS	PPG	OPP PTS	OPP PPG	1DWN	3DWN%	4DWN%
	San Francisco 49ers	1990	16	14-2	.875	14	2	0	40	353	22.1	239	14.9	324
	San Francisco 49ers	1991	16	10-6	.625	10	6	0	50	393	24.6	239	14.9	336	47.7	37.5
	San Francisco 49ers	1992	16	14-2	.875	14	2	0	54	431	26.9	236	14.8	344	46.5	38.5
	San Francisco 49ers	1993	16	10-6	.625	10	6	0	61	473	29.6	295	18.4	372	47.8	62.5
	San Francisco 49ers	1994	16	13-3	.813	13	3	0	66	505	31.6	296	18.5	362	51.0	61.1
	San Francisco 49ers	1995	16	11-5	.688	11	5	0	57	457	28.6	258	16.1	355	48.9	61.1
	San Francisco 49ers	1996	16	12-4	.750	12	4	0	43	398	24.9	257	16.1	315	35.2	63.2
	San Francisco 49ers	1997	16	13-3	.813	13	3	0	41	375	23.4	265	16.6	294	36.4	50.0
	San Francisco 49ers	1998	16	12-4	.750	12	4	0	61	479	29.9	328	20.5	381	45.5	44.4
	San Francisco 49ers	1999	16	4-12	.250	4	12	0	33	295	18.4	453	28.3	300	34.0	34.8
	San Francisco 49ers	2000	16	6-10	.375	6	10	0	49	388	24.3	422	26.4	334	41.6	50.0
	Average				.676	10.8	5.2	0.0	50.5	413.4	25.8	298.9	18.7	337.9
	Total			119-57	.676	119	57	0	555	4,547	25.8	3,288	18.7	3,717

What a glorious decade of fan hood. It's too bad (for them) they spent half that time having to deal with our dynasty.

 

[CWR]

I'm going to assume this post is about asking how the weather is where I'm at.

Hot and humid! 45% chance of afternoon t-storms!

Dang, I thought the weather would be cooler in Philly.

 

[Nav22]

Put up or shut up, no account bet here just a forum approved poll.

2 replies in a row? Someone's shook.

I did that to you.

 

[Typhus]

2 replies in a row? Someone's shook.

I did that to you.

No, if you actually knew me you would know that you were just getting played,,, I already put the ball in your court, your demeaning replies are like the wind off my back side.

 

[CowboysLakerBamaFan]

Dang, I thought the weather would be cooler in Philly.

Ok that was pretty good.

 

[DeaconMoss]

Its really the only thing we can control wether we watch or not.

And whether to buy Merch. 11 jerseys I can comprehend. 4 jersey wearers are a different animal.

 

[DeaconMoss]

Just want to remind every Cowboy fan that our defense held one of the top offenses in the NFL, the Niners, to 310 total yards and 19 points in an entire playoff game. The Niners have ballers at every skill position on offense except Qb and they couldn’t even get 20 points……hard for our defense to keep our offense ahead when they can only muster 1 TD and 12 points

theres not much wrong with our defense……it’s the offense that goes AWOL

And 2 picks gifted SF great field position and still only gave up 19

 

[DeaconMoss]

Yet he lost to Brock Purdy - a rookie QB playing in only the 8th game of his career.

As for the first part of your post, I guess if your goal is to be relevant, you stick with Dak. If you have bigger dreams (i.e. competing for championships), a good front office would consider moving on. Philly moved on from Wentz pretty quick, and it definitely worked out in their favor.

Unfortunately, in Dallas simply being relevant is good enough.

Mr irrelevant

 

[CowboyRoy]

Lamar’s arm is a thousand times better than Dak and he flings it with a flick of the wrist, while Dak’s mechanics are slow. Lamar can throw from the pocket too. His earlier weakness was throwing outside the numbers which happened in the Titans game and their defense was beast anyways those playoffs. But Lamar is a great passer. He also threw 36 TDs in year 2 on 491 attempts while Dak took 7 years to hit 37 on 596 attempts.

Dak hasn’t shown any ability to play in any offense. He can’t even do a traditional 3-5-7 drop back ftom center.





https://www.baltimoreravens.com/news/busting-myth-that-lamar-jackson-struggles-passing-situations

LOL..................Lamar is innacurate. He is NOT a great passer.

But this is what I get for talking with a Dak troll.

Never mind, lets move on. You are so far from reality, its not worth my time.

 

[Typhus]

LOL..................Lamar is innacurate. He is NOT a great passer.

But this is what I get for talking with a Dak troll.

Never mind, lets move on. You are so far from reality, its not worth my time.

Honest question here Roy,,, no baiting.
Would you take a 26yr old Lamar Jackson with his contract over 30yr old Dak and his contract right now, str8 up deal?

 

[Typhus]

2 replies in a row? Someone's shook.

I did that to you.

Runaway now, that's what you do, hit and run.
Your emojis don't back you up.

 

[CowboyRoy]

Honest question here Roy,,, no baiting.
Would you take a 26yr old Lamar Jackson with his contract over 30yr old Dak and his contract right now, str8 up deal?

That would depend on what kind of team you had surrounding the QB. And what kind of OC or scheme you were running. Jackson is a guy you HAVE to change your entire system and personnel for.

If I remember correctly Jackson got about 45 million per year with 4 years guaranteed?

The other problem with Jackson is the guy is one knee injury away from being done in the NFL. He needs to be able to run the ball a lot to be effective. His style is not going to last long.

You can win with both of them. AND I absolutely love the team surrounding Jackson THIS year and the coaching. Perfect situation in Baltimore.

They are going to have to win it all in the next two years. I just dont see Jackson having longevity.

For Baltimore I take Jackson. But no way do I give him 4 years guaranteed.

For a regular offense I am taking Dak and his shorter deal. Dak can play for another 6 or 7 years.

 

[Typhus]

That would depend on what kind of team you had surrounding the QB. And what kind of OC or scheme you were running. Jackson is a guy you HAVE to change your entire system and personnel for.

If I remember correctly Jackson got about 45 million per year with 4 years guaranteed?

The other problem with Jackson is the guy is one knee injury away from being done in the NFL. He needs to be able to run the ball a lot to be effective. His style is not going to last long.

You can win with both of them. AND I absolutely love the team surrounding Jackson THIS year and the coaching. Perfect situation in Baltimore.

They are going to have to win it all in the next two years. I just dont see Jackson having longevity.

For Baltimore I take Jackson. But no way do I give him 4 years guaranteed.

For a regular offense I am taking Dak and his shorter deal. Dak can play for another 6 or 7 years.

Respect what your saying but age alone favoring Jackson, puts him ahead of Dak in longevity is concerned, lets not pretend that Dak doesn't possess injury threat either.
Nor does any QB, but we are comparing these two.
I believe that they are so very similar in comp value, will be interesting to see the Ravens run this higher pass metric offense this season.
Will be a very interesting conversation to re visit post season and compare the two.