If we can stop the run and force more passes from Fields, we should win easily. Not a good QB. A running back playing QB.
I’m not sure, but wasn’t Washington first in sacks allowed when we played them? I know they had given up a lot of them. I believe we only got two sacks on Carson Wentz.
yeah but they basically hampered their passing game to do quick passes. when Wentz held the ball the Cowboys beat the crap out of him.
As I said you play for 60 minutes. Give we wins, stats are what they are.
Yes they can be used the other way. We see them used more against as the term…garbage stats…than for.
Total stats yes are used to prop players up at times also. Everyone has an agenda.
I am just saying the term garbage stats is stupid.
People need to understand most offensive lines tend to be good at one thing and if they're average at the other one you have yourself an elite offensive line.they give up so many sacks because Fields holds the ball for a long time,they run block better than us.
Anyone worried about this game?
I'm not treating the Bears like dogtrash, but they allow a league high amount of sacks while we lead in sacks.
Patriots got 4 sacks on them, and got badly beat. Tho they shot themselves in the foot a lot, while I can't see us doing that to the excess the Patriots did. I think defense should get 4 or 5 sacks, and Parsons (if he plays) should dominate this awful line otherwise it's a disappointment for him. 6 out of 8 of his sacks this year were either in garbage time, against a back up line, or the Bengals.
Thoughts?
And garbage stats are also used to prop up their own players and team with an agenda...this is not a one way street.
Lions are horrible Dallas almost fell behind 13-10 4th quarter . Parsons Tank to the rescue. Take nothing for granted . Lost an O lineman and a DB last week . A win with no serious injury go 6-2 take next week off . Go Cowboys .
![]()
Not even their two running backs?I can't even name an offensive player that they have besides Fields, and he isn't a good QB in my opinion, but that's probably more because I'm ignorant on the Bears roster. Why should it be hard for the defense?
Garbage stats are 42-0 at half time and leaving your starters in especially in the 4th quarter.There is no such thing as garbage stats.
You play who is on your schedule for 60 minutes.
Garbage stats myth are for those with agendas against their own players and team.
They switched to more of an Eagles type of offense last week. Stop the run and force them to pass and pass protect is the key.Anyone worried about this game?
I'm not treating the Bears like dogtrash, but they allow a league high amount of sacks while we lead in sacks.
Patriots got 4 sacks on them, and got badly beat. Tho they shot themselves in the foot a lot, while I can't see us doing that to the excess the Patriots did. I think defense should get 4 or 5 sacks, and Parsons (if he plays) should dominate this awful line otherwise it's a disappointment for him. 6 out of 8 of his sacks this year were either in garbage time, against a back up line, or the Bengals.
Thoughts?