LACowboysFan1
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 11,705
- Reaction score
- 7,620
Miami Vice.
Mainly because the good guys didn't always win...
Mainly because the good guys didn't always win...
Me too.I loved that show—the garment industry with Jerry Lewis; the record company with Tim Curry; Kevin Spacey as Mel Profitt; or how about The Mud People, with real life politician Ted Thompson?
Always wondered what forced the big change from season 1; probably network suits. They always screw up.Stunned that "Wiseguy" did not make any list here...
It's generally accepted the first season was the best–But the others are "good TV".
But that first season, especially the "Sonny Steelgrave" arc is as good a season of TV as there ever has been–Extraordinarily good at a time where there wasn't nearly the emphasis on high quality crime shows.
I also liked NYPD Blue and The Rockford Files.Me too.
It was an outlier when it came to police dramas during that time period. Most people dramas were about the crime, shoot'em ups, car chases and character development was further down the list.
Not this show.
I think with a lot of shows, there's no expectation for anything beyond season 1, so a lot of effort is put into that first season.Always wondered what forced the big change from season 1; probably network suits. They always screw up.
I can see that with some shows; but others? All they had to do was keep on the same track, instead like Wiseguy they went off it. When you change direction, that is a decision. Whoever made that decision for Wiseguy, producer or the suits, screwed up.I think with a lot of shows, there's no expectation for anything beyond season 1, so a lot of effort is put into that first season.
Plus quite often the creator of the series has spent a long time conceiving the show–sometimes years. So much of that thought becomes season 1... And once the show is renewed for season 2, the timeline has shrunk greatly as far as being able to conceive of new ideas.
Also back then a season was 22 episodes. "The Soprano's" were well into season 2 when they had episode 22 and "Breaking Bad" was into its 3rd season!
"Wiseguy" cranked out 75 episodes in 4 years. "Breaking Bad" only had 62 episodes and spread them out over 5 years. "The Soprano's" had 86 episodes spread over 8 years!
It's one reason why British TV shows seem to be of much higher quality–far fewer episodes per season.
Keeping in mind Wahl injured his achilles during the filming of the 2nd season, which definitely contributed to a change in direction.I can see that with some shows; but others? All they had to do was keep on the same track, instead like Wiseguy they went off it. When you change direction, that is a decision. Whoever made that decision for Wiseguy, producer or the suits, screwed up.
True but Wahl injured it after the direction had already changed.Keeping in mind Wahl injured his achilles during the filming of the 2nd season, which definitely contributed to a change in direction.
Oh-Kay.True but Wahl injured it after the direction had already changed.
This is something that I have always thought as well.I think with a lot of shows, there's no expectation for anything beyond season 1, so a lot of effort is put into that first season.
I think the Babylon 5 creator had planned out 5 seasons ahead of time but that is extremely rare.This is something that I have always thought as well.
Since so many TV show ideas get passed over by the networks, the creators seem to create interesting storylines for the first season in an effort to convince the decision makers to order the full first season.
However, in many cases they do not seem to even think about future seasons until they find out it has been renewed, which is why so many times the second season of shows tend to be not as good as the first season before picking back up in season 3.
There are shows where the writers had a multiyear plan or in some cases the entire series planned out in detail.I think the Babylon 5 creator had planned out 5 seasons ahead of time but that is extremely rare.
Don’t you think we’ve seen the end of syndication for reruns because of the constant development of new product?There are shows where the writers had a multiyear plan or in some cases the entire series planned out in detail.
It was probably more common back in the pre-2000s because back then streaming was not mainstream like today, so there were fewer shows ordered by networks which tended to result in shows that networks felt had a good chance to go multiple seasons.
That is especially true because future syndication capabilities of TV shows they owned the rights to was a huge revenue stream for them.
These days, with streaming services everywhere and an almost unlimited consumption base, a lot of networks have incentives to introduce a lot of new shows regularly to keep their subscribers paying every month.
As a result, the networks have shifted away from thinking about multiple seasons and potential syndication earnings and toward injecting new shows into the streaming pool regularly while hoping to hit on "viral" hits occasionally to get their anchor shows.
I think syndication will simply evolve for streaming services.Don’t you think we’ve seen the end of syndication for reruns because of the constant development of new product?
In my opinion there has to be a separation between series that were broadcast on
over the air TV than what was published on streaming services.
The rules are very different in regards to acceptable content.
I'm an old fogy so TV series like Roots and Rich Man, Poor Man where my introduction
into TV series, both excellent by the way.
For services, I prefer short series that don't have to eat up much of my limited TV time.
Band of Brothers, The Pacific, Generation Kill, all good short series.
I've seen a few long series as well, GOT, Banshee, True Blood, Deadwood, Breaking Bad.
In a long series it's tough to keep the story from fading my interest at some point.
Some might scoff but in my opinion, Season 1 of True Detective contains
the best eight episodes ever aired on television.
Like the albums Led Zeppelin I, Back in Black, The Dark Side of the Moon, and
The Rise and Fall of Ziggy Stardust and the Spiders from Mars, and Moving Pictures,
from start to end not a single weak spot or moment of diminished interest.
I do like it a lot and watch it at least once per year.I was told about Band of Brothers, ..started watching but I never finished it .
I remember my family gathering around the living room TV to watch Rich Man Poor Man .. I was too young to really know what was going on, but i knew my
may family love/hated " Falcon Eddie " an intriguing villain that was so ruthless and yet so difficult to catch .
I was told about Band of Brothers, ..started watching but I never finished it .
Band of Brothers is great but like all mini series its not for everyone.
I remember my family gathering around the living room TV to watch Rich Man Poor Man .. I was too young to really know what was going on, but i knew my
may family love/hated " Falcon Eddie " an intriguing villain that was so ruthless and yet so difficult to catch .
I was told about Band of Brothers, ..started watching but I never finished it .
North & SouthBand of Brothers is great but like all mini series its not for everyone.
Rich Man Poor Man does not get the cred it deserves because Roots came out the next year
Mid 70's to late 80's was the greatest time for them
The networks were basically in competition to one up the other
RICH MAN POOR MAN
ROOTS
SHOGUN
Winds of War & War and Remembrance (most expensive miniseries of all time when adjusted for inflation)
LONESOME DOVE
Loved North and South books one and two; three was a downerNorth & South
The Thornbirds