Best QB Game

[Boom]

Roger Staubach 103
Joe Montana 97+
Otto Graham 61
Johnny Unitas 27-
Troy Aikman 10

 

[DallasFanSince86]

Roger Staubach 103
Joe Montana 98+
Otto Graham 60-
Johnny Unitas 27
Troy Aikman 10

 

[jackrussell]

A heads up....starting Saturday.

With the list shaping up as it is...there will be a change in the scoring, as to wrap it up a bit faster.

+1 for the best on the list...-2 for the worst.

Again...starting Saturday...I'll post a reminder.

 

[rcaldw]

A heads up....starting Saturday.

With the list shaping up as it is...there will be a change in the scoring, as to wrap it up a bit faster.

+1 for the best on the list...-2 for the worst.

Again...starting Saturday...I'll post a reminder.

Why would you give those AGAINST a player twice as much power as those for him?

Makes no sense. Especially since you have been voting against Aikman from the beginning?

If you had instituted this last week then Elway would still be in this game. I'm just one vote, but I don't like this.

 

[DallasEast]

Roger Staubach 104+
Joe Montana 98
Otto Graham 60
Johnny Unitas 27
Troy Aikman 9-

 

[jackrussell]

Why would you give those AGAINST a player twice as much power as those for him?

Makes no sense. Especially since you have been voting against Aikman from the beginning?

If you had instituted this last week then Elway would still be in this game. I'm just one vote, but I don't like this.

It's an ELIMINATION game.

What does me voting against Aikman have to do with anything?

It's been suggested to wrap it up...how do you do so by adding 2 and subtracting 1?

What is your suggestion?

 

[DallasEast]

It's an ELIMINATION game.

What does me voting against Aikman have to do with anything?

It's been suggested to wrap it up...how do you do so by adding 2 and subtracting 1?

What is your suggestion?

JR, you've good two great games going. It's a shame you're getting some flack over it. Stay strong, brother!

pssst! Any chance of changing the negative vote from -2 points to -3 points? shhh! PM me. j/k

 

[Chuck 54]

Roger Staubach 104
Joe Montana 99+
Otto Graham 60
Johnny Unitas 27
Troy Aikman 8-

 

[LeonDixson]

Roger Staubach 105+
Joe Montana 98-
Otto Graham 60
Johnny Unitas 27
Troy Aikman 8

 

[Skinsmaniac]

Why would you give those AGAINST a player twice as much power as those for him?

Makes no sense. Especially since you have been voting against Aikman from the beginning?

If you had instituted this last week then Elway would still be in this game. I'm just one vote, but I don't like this.

I think it's a good idea. Right now lots of people are canceling each other out, and making it +2/-2 wouldn't change that. This will make the game go a little faster, although I don't think we are stuck in quite the same cycle in this game as we are in the RB game.

 

[The Rawhide Kid]

Roger Staubach 106+
Joe Montana 98
Otto Graham 59-
Johnny Unitas 27
Troy Aikman 8

 

[Mavs Man]

I think it's a good idea. Right now lots of people are canceling each other out, and making it +2/-2 wouldn't change that. This will make the game go a little faster, although I don't think we are stuck in quite the same cycle in this game as we are in the RB game.

Same here. Not saying I don't enjoy this game, but as we cut the list down it slows down further and further.

 

[The Rawhide Kid]

I think it's a good idea. Right now lots of people are canceling each other out, and making it +2/-2 wouldn't change that. This will make the game go a little faster, although I don't think we are stuck in quite the same cycle in this game as we are in the RB game.

Agreed. The QB game isn't nearly as deadlocked as the RB game. If Jack didn't do this, we'd probably finish both games by the time the season starts.

 

[jackrussell]

I think it's a good idea. Right now lots of people are canceling each other out, and making it +2/-2 wouldn't change that. This will make the game go a little faster, although I don't think we are stuck in quite the same cycle in this game as we are in the RB game.

I'd concede to that...just afraid people would get the 2 different scoring systems mixed up. So we'll try it.

The QB game remains the same, +1 and -1...until we reach the final 3. Agreed?

The RB game will start the +1 and -2 scoring Saturday.

Hey...a work in progress, suggestions are always welcome...just complaining gets us nowhere.

 

[jackrussell]

Agreed. The QB game isn't nearly as deadlocked as the RB game. If Jack didn't do this, we'd probably finish both games by the time the season starts.

The board I stole this idea from (non football related) has games lasting literally 500 pages and several months and still nowhere to completing.

I'd rather see an equitable end over a good amount of time...but nowhere near that much time.

I won't post another game til one of these ends. Hopefully a draft game.

 

[JonJon]

Roger Staubach 106
Joe Montana 99+
Otto Graham 58-
Johnny Unitas 27
Troy Aikman 8

 

[kTXe]

Roger Staubach 106
Joe Montana 100+
Otto Graham 58
Johnny Unitas 27
Troy Aikman 7-

 

[Skinsmaniac]

I'd concede to that...just afraid people would get the 2 different scoring systems mixed up. So we'll try it.

The QB game remains the same, +1 and -1...until we reach the final 3. Agreed?

The RB game will start the +1 and -2 scoring Saturday.

Hey...a work in progress, suggestions are always welcome...just complaining gets us nowhere.

Oh, I wasn't suggesting we not do +1/-2 here. I agree that people might get mixed up. Let's keep the rules consistent in both games +1/-2.

 

[Eskimo]

Roger Staubach 106
Joe Montana 101+
Otto Graham 58
Johnny Unitas 27
Troy Aikman 6-[/QUOTE]

 

[UVAwahoos]

Roger Staubach 106
Joe Montana 100-
Otto Graham 58
Johnny Unitas 27
Troy Aikman 7+