zrinkill;1397287 said:I will change it up and say this ..... If Bo Jackson would have never had his horrible hip injury ..... I believe he would have been the greatest most dominate back ever .....
Maybe so, if he hadn't had the injury and if he'd concentrated solely on football. Not that I blame him...I'd have played baseball full-time. Better money and less chance of being maimed.zrinkill;1397287 said:I will change it up and say this ..... If Bo Jackson would have never had his horrible hip injury ..... I believe he would have been the greatest most dominate back ever .....
zrinkill;1397287 said:I will change it up and say this ..... If Bo Jackson would have never had his horrible hip injury ..... I believe he would have been the greatest most dominate back ever .....
zrinkill;1397298 said:Man that whould have been a showdown .... Earl Campbell and Bo Jackson in their primes .....
I got an Autograph pic of Earl Campbell in the early 80's ...... his leggs were still bigger than my whole body ....
Hostile;1397188 said:One last thing, the stuff about his sub par O-line is a joke. Lomas Brown was a fantastic LT and he had an excellent Center in Glover as well. Almost every year that Emmitt had 2 Pro Bowl guys in front of him Barry did too.
Barry lacked a team and yet he still out-performed Emmitt in every way except winning.
I will change it up and say this ..... If Bo Jackson would have never had his horrible hip injury ..... I believe he would have been the greatest most dominate back ever .....
I have pissed off a few Barry fans in my day. I will not budge on my opinion of him. I wouldn't want him.visionary;1397278 said:you said it so i dont have to spend time re-typing the same thing.
thanx
I can't say I disagree with this, except I would add the caveat if he had not played baseball too. If he concentrated solely on football and not got hurt I think he would have been dominant, or would dominate.zrinkill;1397287 said:I will change it up and say this ..... If Bo Jackson would have never had his horrible hip injury ..... I believe he would have been the greatest most dominate back ever .....
Barry could have 4000 yards more than Emmitt and I still wouldn't want him. It has NOTHING whatsover to do with yardage.Phoenix-Talon;1397349 said:While both athletes were very good, believe Barry Sanders edges Emmitt out by two shakes of a lion's tail. Barry chose to retire (early) Emmitt could have played another year with Arizona, tested the waters and no one wanted to bite.
For what it's worth, Emmitt is a far Better dancer than Barry.
wick;1397379 said:My opinion is that if you are benched on short-yardage and goal line downs, then you are automatically disqualified from the discussion.