Blog: Cowboy Flavored Kool-Aid -- Is Cowboys' Garrett Really the Answer?

NextGenBoys

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,252
Reaction score
1,964
Posted by RichieZ23 on November 17, 2010:

The Cowboys are the NFL’s laughing stock for the second time in three years. (2008 was another “Super Bowl or bust season, in which Dallas missed the playoffs altogether) Sitting at 1-7 and going into week ten, Dallas had the second-worst record in the league behind only Buffalo. The knock on Dallas was simple — they were an undisciplined team with little attention to detail, who made mistakes and could not play a complete 60-minute ball game. Many questions arose in Dallas, but talent was rarely one of them.


Garrett has initiated a change of attitude and culture in Dallas. Attention to detail and the approach to practice has been altered so far under Garrett. With talent not being a burden, (Dallas arguably has three top-five players at their position in Demarcus Ware, Jay Ratliff, and Jason Witten. Garrett must both motivate prepare a mistake-ridden club that has little to play for in 2010. Oh yeah, besides their jobs. Players on Dallas knew that Phillips would be fired before they would, and their performance on the field did little to say they wanted anything but Phillips out of Dallas.

For more... http://******/aDZyac
 
Good article thats dead on. I would actually like to fast forward this season and get to the draft. I really want too see how the Boys start out the 2011 season.
 
NextGenBoys;3705773 said:
No thoughts/comments?

Man, I suck lol

I think the lack of comments isn't due to a lack of interest in the subject matter, but is probably due to the fact that most don't want to start makin judgements about Garrett as the HC over the long term until they see more. I think that's where most fans are, in a wait and see mode. That's probably actually an improvement for Garrett. I think some fans probably upgraded from thinking NO WAY to Garrett, to now thinking they will give him some time to prove himself.
 
hope JJ doesnt throw draft away.... need another pick like last yr (DBryant)
 
bmzt31;3705824 said:
hope JJ doesnt throw draft away.... need another pick like last yr (DBryant)

Well we will get a chance.

Mid round pick at the very worst.

We need immediate help at guard, tackle, safety, and middle linebacker.

If we have a high enough pick (top ten) I would like to trade down maybe 5-8 spots and pick up a few extra picks to fill our holes.
 
NextGenBoys;3705830 said:
Well we will get a chance.

Mid round pick at the very worst.

We need immediate help at guard, tackle, safety, and middle linebacker.

If we have a high enough pick (top ten) I would like to trade down maybe 5-8 spots and pick up a few extra picks to fill our holes.

It's not the number of picks we have it's how you use them. 2009 we had what 12 picks and look at that draft.

Maybe a new coaching staff can get the "talent" out of our current players. But the past few drafts have left a lot to be desired, in regards to impact players.
 
No he is not the Cowboys answers..I don't think it was any sort of accident that garretts play calling sucked when Wade was head coach, in time he is going to revert back to the garrett of old. failing to run the ball..Forcing Romo when and if he does comeback this year. in to situations where he is gonna have to step back and pass, when they fail, leaving Tony vulnerable to another injury which could be worse than the one he has now
 
TX Cowboy;3705864 said:
No he is not the Cowboys answers..I don't think it was any sort of accident that garretts play calling sucked when Wade was head coach, in time he is going to revert back to the garrett of old. failing to run the ball..Forcing Romo when and if he does comeback this year. in to situations where he is gonna have to step back and pass, when they fail, leaving Tony vulnerable to another injury which could be worse than the one he has now

Totally disagree. Bad pass protection caused Romo's injury, not playcalling. You think who ever the next HC won't call a pass play, forcing Romo to "step back and pass"? It doesn't matter what play you call or whose calling it, if your Oline, and rbs cannot pass or run block.
 
Very happy with the way the team played this past week let just see how the teams does as we move forward.
 
DBOY3141;3705851 said:
It's not the number of picks we have it's how you use them. 2009 we had what 12 picks and look at that draft.

Maybe a new coaching staff can get the "talent" out of our current players. But the past few drafts have left a lot to be desired, in regards to impact players.

Sure it's how you use them, but that doesn't change the fact that the more picks you have the better the odds of finding some quality players.
 
DBOY3141;3705851 said:
It's not the number of picks we have it's how you use them. 2009 we had what 12 picks and look at that draft.

Maybe a new coaching staff can get the "talent" out of our current players. But the past few drafts have left a lot to be desired, in regards to impact players.

You have a better chance to draft "impact players", if you have a impact pick, for ex. a 1st rounder, 2nd rounder, which, since Jerry traded away his 1st rounder in 09, lessoned his chances in 09 of drafting a impact player. Certainly found a impact player in this past draft.
 
jjktkk;3705903 said:
You have a better chance to draft "impact players", if you have a impact pick, for ex. a 1st rounder, 2nd rounder, which, since Jerry traded away his 1st rounder in 09, lessoned his chances in 09 of drafting a impact player. Certainly found a impact player in this past draft.


They also found an impact player in the 7th round (Ratliff), and impact player in the 3rd round (Witten), and a couple of impact players that weren't drafted at all (Romo, Austin). Having a higher pick may increase your odds of getting an impact player in that particular round, but having more picks can also pay big dividends because it can help you find gems throughout the draft.

i wouldn't trade down from, say, the 5th pick to the 20th pick, but I would trade down from the 5th pick to the 10th pick if i felt like a player I wanted would still be there and I could get a couple of extra picks in the process.
 
Stautner;3705934 said:
They also found an impact player in the 7th round (Ratliff), and impact player in the 3rd round (Witten), and a couple of impact players that weren't drafted at all (Romo, Austin). Having a higher pick may increase your odds of getting an impact player in that particular round, but having more picks can also pay big dividends because it can help you find gems throughout the draft.

i wouldn't trade down from, say, the 5th pick to the 20th pick, but I would trade down from the 5th pick to the 10th pick if i felt like a player I wanted would still be there and I could get a couple of extra picks in the process.

+1, I always love it when Jerry and co. acquire as many picks as possible. Love how New England's Belichick always trades for and/or accumalates extra picks.
 
Screw the draft. It's mid season, lets focus on winning games with the players we have.
 
After watching the Skins the other night, I dont think we are considered the laughing stock of the NFL right now.:D
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,585
Messages
14,546,850
Members
24,212
Latest member
JerryJonesSupporter
Back
Top