RonWashington
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 12,129
- Reaction score
- 9,618
The one year of production gives pause. Keeping Diggs makes paying Bland prohibitive.
Diggs is not a factor right now . Bland Will be in camp competing
The one year of production gives pause. Keeping Diggs makes paying Bland prohibitive.
Yeah, it doesn't make up itA guy who gets beat a lot but gets INT's?
How many sixes did he give up?6 pick sixes in one year a mistake .
![]()
How many sixes did he give up?
The obsession with one stat and not the overall body of work is bizarre.How many does anyone give up ? This obsession on this board with getting rid of Parsons Bland is bizarre
![]()
The obsession with one stat and not the overall body of work is bizarre.
This ain't fantasy football.
Outlier stats, in one season, don't mean much.
the TDs after his picks were fortuitous and circumstantial. Statistically, there is no predictive ability of future events.
Fix the pass rush and you can suit up a traffic cone to play cb! lol
I would say both have only been mediocre and have a tendency to go feast or famine. We have seen flashes similar to this before and there is a reason that a single high INT season is not worth paying big money for because it never duplicates itself. Meanwhile if you want to know what does sustain, it is good and solid coverage where you just lock a guy down. The CBs who can do that at a high level can replicate that year over year.So Bland is the young aggressive ball hawk corner you want to flush ?
![]()
Bland is decent, not convinced he's great though. But the 6 pick sixes were anomalies. Statistically, they are not predictive.It’s more than INT’s the guys a cover corner. Meaning passes are contested plus the dude tackles well for his position . Sure get rid of Bland with Diggs on injury leave meaning the Cowboys are in for 350 yards passing regularly. The theory on this board to lose Parsons and Bland is grounded in zero logic.
You win with premier talent that’s how this works .
Blimey!