Bob Sanders just dropped an int...

[SDogo]

Such as what? If Roy was getting beaten frequently in coverage, the numbers would say so. But they don't. Like I said in that post that was quoted, Roy's only problem was being involved in too many touchdowns -- and that has more to do with where the offense is on the field than anything else. Allowing a 17-yard catch by a tight end in the red zone doesn't make you any worse than if you had allowed a 17-yard catch near midfield.

Exactly what are those numbers hiding? Things that never happened?

Adam, don't you find it funny that those on the other side of the Williams argument can produce their own numbes to support their case?

What numbers are hiding is production and final results on the field. Need any more proof then Aikman?

Statistically in the most talked about catagories he was very average. Final product and results on the field say otherwise.

 

[SDogo]

Can you explain how the REAL numbers hide anything? The only reason you dont like the numbers is because they dont fit your agenda. If they showed Roy was as bad as you say he is, you would be touting them all over the forum

Just did thanks. Now if you would kindly stop riding my sack it would be appreciated.

 

[SDogo]

Age doesnt matter. That was my point. You made a comment about guys who watched the game for 20 years and that has nothing to do with anything.

Whatever though... I am missing too much of the game so have fun talking to yourself.

Good, cause age was nevr my point either. Carry on.

 

[BigDFan5]

Adam, don't you find it funny that those on the other side of the Williams argument can produce their own numbes to support their case?

what numbers would these be?

 

[BigDFan5]

Just did thanks. Now if you would kindly stop riding my sack it would be appreciated.

LMAO you didnt say anything at all.

As for riding you, umm I was posting in this thread when you came in and tried throwing your agenda around. Maybe you shouldnt post if you dont like facts being brought to the table

 

[AdamJT13]

Adam, don't you find it funny that those on the other side of the Williams argument can produce their own numbes to support their case?

No, I'm still waiting for that. Show me ANY numbers -- other than TDs allowed, which I've already given -- that suggest anything negative about Roy's coverage ability.

 

[SDogo]

what numbers would these be?

I don't find you attractive. Please go away.

I'm sorry I don't always take notes and I'm sorry I'm not hung up on numbers like so many here but there has been more then 1 article and segmant that have taken on this argument.

 

[SDogo]

No, I'm still waiting for that. Show me ANY numbers -- other than TDs allowed, which I've already given -- that suggest anything negative about Roy's coverage ability.

Watch a game, forget the numbers for once. Not everyone will bow to your numbers.

 

[SDogo]

LMAO you didnt say anything at all.

As for riding you, umm I was posting in this thread when you came in and tried throwing your agenda around. Maybe you shouldnt post if you dont like facts being brought to the table

So no one with a different opinion can post in "your" threads? Maybe you should start your own board.

 

[smarta5150]

So no one with a different opinion can post in "your" threads? Maybe you should start your own board.

 

[Gaede]

so Roy is alright since he only gave up 8 touchdowns but had more tackles and interceptions?!

8 touchdowns is 8 touchdowns!

 

[SDogo]

so Roy is alright since he only gave up 8 touchdowns?!

8 touchdowns is 8 touchdowns!

I'm curious Adam, how does that compare to every other safety in the league?

 

[Rack]

I love this thread.

I have been saying the same things in the game thread.

I think more people need to watch more games besides JUST the Dallas game.

If they did do so we could eliminate 90% of the stupid threads that say "we drop too many INTs" and the ones drawing ridiculous comparisons with Roy and guys like Ed Reed.

All teams drop INTs... thats why they play defense.

All safeties give up completions and deep balls and take bad angles sometimes.

THe problems come when a person watches ONLY the Dallas game and draw conclusions from expections of being perfect.

QFT

Figures, you talk like you know something, but when given the chance to show everyone you slink away into 3 word answers that have nothing to do with the post

Owned

From Adam http://cowboyszone.com/forums/showpost.php?p=1308619&postcount=57

Owned again.


Someone got their arse handed to them in this thread... can you guess who that someone is?

 

[SDogo]

QFT



Owned



Owned again.


Someone got their arse handed to them in this thread... can you guess who that someone is?

No who? You mean you take the side of the argument your on? NO WAY!

 

[BigDFan5]

I don't find you attractive. Please go away.

I'm sorry I don't always take notes and I'm sorry I'm not hung up on numbers like so many here but there has been more then 1 article and segmant that have taken on this argument.

You are the one that said Anti Roy people have numbers to back them up correct?


As for articles and segments can you link one with any actual proof of what you say or is it more media opinion with no basis on reality?

 

[BigDFan5]

So no one with a different opinion can post in "your" threads? Maybe you should start your own board.

Nice, now show me exactly where I said that? You sure are bad at this. How about we stick to things that are true, and actually said from now on? Is that cool with you?

 

[Rack]

No who? You mean you take the side of the argument your on? NO WAY!

You can find the biggest Roy hater on the planet, and even he'd see you got your *** handed to you in this thread. "Sides" has nothing to do with it.

 

[SDogo]

You are the one that said Anti Roy people have numbers to back them up correct?


As for articles and segments can you link one with any actual proof of what you say or is it more media opinion with no basis on reality?

Again, I'm sorry. I'll have to start keeping a notebook of everything that is printed, published or viewed on TV just in case I ever feel the need to share one of my opinions in one of "your" threads again.

 

[SDogo]

Nice, now show me exactly where I said that? You sure are bad at this. How about we stick to things that are true, and actually said from now on? Is that cool with you?

Can you live by your own rules?

 

[SDogo]

You can find the biggest Roy hater on the planet, and even he'd see you got your *** handed to you in this thread. "Sides" has nothing to do with it.

Opinions are great! Glad you have one.