Hawkeye0202
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 25,834
- Reaction score
- 46,962
No excuse for this........
They were open several times though.3 of those 6 targets came in one game - against Arizona when they have their biggest red zone problems of the year. In other words, this stat means nothing. None of those guys were open Sunday.
I think down near the goal line you have to be able to run the football, use deception, and have plays to designed to get guys open. Fade and that stuff, are hard to execute down there.
Looks like Schultz misses Dallas.It looks like we miss Schultz after all. He had 9 red zone TD receptions last year to Lambs 7 and Gallups 6.
https://www.pro-football-reference.com/years/2022/redzone-receiving.htm
Show the videos. I've got the All-22. Didn't see them open.They were open several times though.
No excuse for this........
He got paid. That’s all he cares about. Any of us would have done the same.Looks like Schultz misses Dallas.
His 7 catches for 47 yards.
That is the biggest change unless Schultz opened things up for other guys. We do have at least a couple of TD drops by TE’s.As noted in the tweet comments, while we had issues in previous years, we were much better in the red zone under Moore with Dak as the QB.
People need to wake up to the reality that the biggest issue offensively with this team is probably the guy calling the plays thus far this year.
Dallas offered him more than Houston And long termHe got paid. That’s all he cares about. Any of us would have done the same.
why? I have been arguing since AZ game that our redzone play designs are not good. no imagination. easy to defend. easy to read. specially inside the 10. even in AZ game, the last play with the interception it was a horribly designed play. horribly executed. faults all around.Well. Every pass to them seems to be a jump ball in the corner
That's news to me if true. Do you have a link to any verification?Dallas offered him more than Houston And long term