Maybe it is to move on.
There's an argument for that, and you've made it. I put it differently in other posts, but I think we see the same weakness in Dak's game. He has trouble with zones and mixed coverages. Doesn't see where the receiver is *going* to very well.
The counter argument is that while Dak still has a weakness, most QBs do, and those that don't can't be ordered from Amazon. And more than most QBs, Dak has shown he can significantly improve his game. Are the chances with Dak *worse* than the alternative?
My ideal long term QB strategy is to continually churn down draft QBs and QB retreads until you hit on one. Particularly running QBs. Build the rest of the team but QB on the cheap. Only think about paying free agent money when the rest of the team is ready.
I've said this for years, and wanted to move on from Dak to pursue that strategy in other years. But Dak really has improved major aspects of his game, and I think he's almost worth the free agent money he requires. And the rest of the team is close as well. We're not perfect at every position, but we're strong on both sides of the ball. The main weakness is right up the gut on defense, but much of that could have been fixed *this* year by playing Parsons at MLB. Still need better play at DT, though.
But I was responding to a post with two false claims with two counter claims - that Dak does have arm talent, and our WRs past Lamb are meh. If you disagree with those, have at it.