bbgun said:How much worse could Terry be?
Troy Brown is built like a compact tank. He can tackle fairly decently too.bbgun said:<Even if our secondary was depleted, Terry and Peerless hardly appear to be defensive back material.>
And you know this how? They're short, but so is Troy Brown.
<The notion either could do better than Aaron Glenn is preposterous.>
Baloney. It just hasn't been tried yet. If Deion can play a handful of snaps on offense, no reason why Glenn or Price can't do the opposite.
bbgun said:And three of those four completions contributed to devastating losses. I win.
That would be a great idea. It's not like Glenn has a history of getting injured when he plays solely on offense or anything.......sheesh. I hit the bottle hard after yesterday's debacle too, but not that hard.bbgun said:We need to steal a page from New England's playbook and employ Glenn or Price as nickel DB's late in the game during obvious passing situations. Just sub Terry for Aaron.
AdamJT13 said:None of them contributed to a loss. Those five games are since the Commanders game. And Aaron Glenn didn't allow a completion yesterday, he just had the pass interference. Put Terry Glenn out there, and we might be 1-6.
bbgun said:I see. So you deliberately excluded the Skins game to make Glenn appear better. You're a bum.
I can't believe you're allowing yourself to get dragged into this train-wreck of a thread.AdamJT13 said:I didn't exclude anything. I plainly said, "in the past five games." Other than the penalty yesterday, Aaron Glenn has played great since the Commanders game. There's no reason to replace him with an offensive player, of all people.