dragon_mikal
Fire Garrett
- Messages
- 10,453
- Reaction score
- 7,136
Whatever.
Landry 'only' won two SBs and lost three. He also had us in it for 20 years going to 10 CC games in 13 years. He had some great players including Staubach who IMO is the GOAT not Brady. Won't argue with you though. They almost ran Landry out of town before he started getting successful. Different times, too. So I'd go easy on Garrett for now and see what happens.
Bilichick is great, too. See what happens when Brady is gone though; assuming he doesn't find another wonderboy.
I think it's the opposite. I think Belichek can keep on with a decent QB. Brady is good but not the greatest and not the sole reason they win. Without Belichek I bet Brady is lucky to hit 10 wins most seasons
GB don't have Belichek either. Most times I agree but even last night I wasn't impressed with Brady as a QB.I partially agree. No one wins without players though and QB is the start. GB is below avg without AR. NE won't be in 7 st8 CC games without Brady.
He kept on for a full season with Cassell so..........After yesterday, for me, it's not even debatable.
Brady is two plays from being 7 for 7 in Super Bowls.
Belichick has proven that he can win a few games with almost any QB.
But he cannot "keep on" for a full season without Brady.
He kept on for a full season with Cassell so..........
He kept on for a full season with Cassell so..........
You don't know that though. You are speculating. Sanchez went to 2 straight AFC championship gamesUnderstood,
My friend... Belichick ain't going to 7 Super Bowls with cassel
You don't know that though. You are speculating. Sanchez went to 2 straight AFC championship games