The great QBs basically ask 2 things of their WRs: be where you are supposed to be and catch the ball. If they are covered the QB will throw elsewhere but it seems like the only thing the great QBs get frustrated by is not being where you should and dropping the ball.
So. That would be a no..?I'll continue to post how long ever i feel... but thanks for your concern there is no rule against the length of my posts nor sentence structure... if you guys are worried about go to twitter where you do not have to worry about it because they limit texts....
so you can keep following my posts around and trying to bait me, it wont work i'm going to continue doing what i want..... and by the way i'm glad it bothers a good handful of people in here, they annoy me equally as much....
i'm not a content creator or a mod or work for this place so no NEED for more professionally written posts, save that for Bob or other on the staff.
If its easier put me on ignore..
Brooks got limited chances and he had two big screw ups.... one can argue it contributed heavily to the lob sided loss. with that said, if he catches that and we end up scoring. if he makes a block and cook scores. we still lose this game, because Saints took their foot off the pedal and slowed their offense. they could have easily continued and scored on every drive and probably get to 60 points easily.
Agreed. There are different forms of leadership. Quarterbacks have cussed out their receivers for as long as football has existed. It has sometimes gotten receivers to focus and perform better.
lol. Who has said or suggested Prescott should not have been angry that Brooks fell down and caused the interception?
His alligator arms on the deep ball didn't help his cause either.
True that.
If a 12 yard out is called by the OC, the QB doesn't get to decide he will not run that play because he doesn't "trust" the WR.
sure he does. happens all the time. but you're also describing a route, not a play. most plays there are multiple options and potential targets. a qb's comfort level in the players can have an impact on where he decides to go.
What hate?
So everyone must be perfect for Dak, but when he misses an open WR, we are supposed to look the other way?he had a right to be mad because he knew right after the game in allk the SM recitons and ESPN,
That he would be blamed for the interception,
and he also knew,
it chaged the game big picture A LOT.. Dak and the offense were doing all they could like last years Seatle game to keep up with terrible defense and that INT turned the game , literally took us out of not only scoring on that drive, BUT the d turned around and gave up ANOTHER TD..
it was major blow and remember all the
"we need to see more emotions and reactions that bad plays are unacceptable out of our payers" well there you go. In the heat of the moment he was angry because it was major blow to staying in a game eating more clock and knowing they get the ball back first in the 2nd half,
i see that play as major reason we lost a n opportunity to keep it closer, outside the Defense playing historically bad and w likely lose anyway...
i'm sure privately in the locker room they are all cool but im ok with Dak expressing his emotions in the battle.. it was a costly mistake regardless of if it was an accident.
Cooks all of sudden becomes mediocre when he joined the Cowboys? That dude is a beast. He just not utilized at all on the Cowboys. They just spam to CeeDee.
