Breaking Down Every Single Dak Interception

[T-RO]

Your post has ***********absolutely nothing********* to do with the thread topic, AC.

You're soiling your pants again, dude.

Do you have a filter that makes you ask before you post something:
-Is this on topic?
-Am I making sense?
-Will this embarrass me?

Perhaps consider installing such a filter. Home Depot might have something to help.

 

[CowboyoWales]

In essence giving them a bonus bite at the apple.

Didnt everyone of the 2nd Q INT's result in points for the opposition?

Im supporting taking the calculated risk of trying to score before half by being aggressive if there is a low chance of turning the ball over leads to points for the other team.

That being said...If that is what the Cowboys are/were doing with the 10 Dak INT's, aka BEING AGGRESSIVE, I am all for it.

These late INT's, coupled with the 3rd down and long yardage turnovers (and even the misfiring vrs 49ers) all appear to converge on there being a gulf between Dak's ability to over extend his abilities when under pressure and what Moore's asking him to do. The difference in the performance when Dak's allowed to play within his comfort zone suggests we (maybe Dak, may of been Moore) should of continued doing the simple things well. We dont need a hero....even the two 49ers loses, were set up for calm and steady.

We'll hopefully see this without Moore.

 

[doomsday9084]

One guy has been praised as being among the best passers ever who could carry his team under any circumstance, regardless of his career long history of INTs, and could put up the best/most passing game numbers...

While the other guy has been labeled as not being a natural or good passer, is a high turnover guy, especially when everything is put on his shoulders, can't carry the team/wilts under pressure, and does not have the talent to put up the best/most passing game numbers...

I know that a lot of the battles on this board are carry overs from when Romo was QB. I wasn't here then and I largely don't care about the comparison. They are two different QB's playing in two different eras with two different teams around them. If you compare Dak to Unitas in this manner, Dak is going to look much better than Unitas and you will make yourself look like a fool in doing so.

Unitas 2nd year, per game:
212y 2td 8.5y/a 88.0 passer rating
All of that lead the NFL.

What I care about is the Cowboys winning. From my vantage point, if the Cowboys can find a quality RB2, this will be the best team they have put on the field since the dynasty. The defense might be the best since the 70's. This gets back to Parcells' advice to Romo. Be a bus driver. The team can most certainly win with Dak playing like he did earlier in his career. Protect the ball and make safe throws.

The thing that irks me is that if Dallas does win, all of the people who are clearly not Cowboy fans but just Dak fans are going to crow about it constantly making sites like this unreadable.