So being arrested proves your guilty? From the 90 minutes between Hernandez being arrested and him being release, you think the Patriots knew he was guilty? Of course you do! why else would he be released right?
Do you know what a "precedent" is? I understand you are a marketing genius but with common sense, you are not.
Keeping Brent sets a bad precedent. It sends a message to the players that they can screw up royally multiple times, with no consequences.
This has a negative effect on the morale, and weakens the leadership within an organization...do you agree that holding players accountable for their actions is necessary?
You ignore my contention about false equivalence.
You tell me that I have no way of knowing whether or not he was guilty and with the same brain think you can tell me how the morale within the organization or the or how leadership is taken within the organization.
I did some digging concerning Hernandez case. Let's take a look at what we know and thus we know what the police know and then compare and contrast what you know about the players, front office and morale of the Dallas Cowboys.
1) Hernandez was seen on a security video the night of the shooting carrying a glock .45, the weapon used in the shooting.
2) Hernandez has been seen in other locations with said weapon and the police found a magazine and ammunition for the weapon at his home.
3) Hernandez 'cleaned' his home. IOW, made an effort to remove evidence of the crime.
4) He told his girlfriend not to cooperate with police.
5) Two days before the murder, Hernandez and the victim got into a confrontation at a Boston nightclub.
6) A Nissan Altima was seen leaving the location of the murder and Hernandez rented a Nissan Altima in that time frame.
So on this basis I can understand why the Patriots would think that he had perpetrated a capital crime. Now how about you tell me how the FO's approach to Brent had "a negative effect on the morale, and weaken(ed) the leadership within an organization."
Please be specific.