I hear you, and agree.
But my point was that Nick Foles was also in the conversation.
And fwiw, Dak also didn't play under center at all in college and was pretty mobile, so there was that.
But yes, they've always seem uncomparable overall to me.
Anyone that tries to compare Dak to RG is just being lazy or influenced by race. The only things they have in common are the QB position and their skin color.
His approach to the game reminds me of Aikman. He really does not want to throw INTs and will throw the ball away. Aikman didn't get the same Wow reviews by the media and fans as a guy like Farve, but Aikman was the one you wanted on your team if you're a Head Coach.
Physically, McNabb is probably a good comp to Dak; although, Dak seems more accurate.
Dak's game isn't a "gimmick"; he exhibits hard-work and knowledge of the game that helped to make him the player that he was; yes, the scheme was ball-control with the game's best OLine and a shiny new RB to lead the league in rushing...but, Dak had to learn on the fly, no one at this time last year saw him starting, let alone having the year that he did
I am excited to see how he develops this year and into the future, this will be a fun ride
He almost didn't either.After our game against S.F. last year you just knew the 'chipster's' Q.B. wasn't gonna make it thru the whole 16 games.
A more logical comparasion for those trying to diminish Dak would be Nick Foles in Philly. I believe it was his sophomore season but he came out of nowhere, got red hot and really put together one of the best seasons in NFL history while relying on his very good supporting cast and avoiding mistakes.
I wouldn't make that comparasion, Dak is the real deal but comparing him to RGIII has more to do with race than play. Dak doesn't really scramble much, it's literally a last resort so there is zero comparasion between him and Griffin in regards to playing style.
It's gonna be funny when he starts to struggle reading coverages...and people can't figure out why...and start wanting Moore as the starter... Romo/Moore were telling him where to go w/ the football last year. Hopefully I'm wrong...but I'm not going to be shocked when he suddenly can't find open receivers.
Physically, McNabb is probably a good comp to Dak; although, Dak is already way more accurate.
( note to self:Dak is way more mature than RG3 was in his rookie year. There's still some chance RG3's career will rebound, and I have nothing against him, but Dak has gotten a better start than he did. He's built a better foundation to build from.
we see where those quarterbacks and the read-option as a base offense, which is how the 2012 Commanders and Griffin were using it, are today.
Prescott has far better fundamentals and is much stronger physically.Dak is way more mature than RG3 was in his rookie year. There's still some chance RG3's career will rebound, and I have nothing against him, but Dak has gotten a better start than he did. He's built a better foundation to build from.
RG3 is a loser. Dak is a winner. Simple answer
Prescott has far better fundamentals and is much stronger physically.