condoin125
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 582
- Reaction score
- 596
Damn, I'm surprised how much this move got to me....he made some huge kicks for us during his time here. I hate to see him go but I'm not necessarily saying it's the wrong move either.
Glad to see the present Cowboys front office doing what needs to be done– Jettisoning (when possible) overpaid players who aren't producing to their former level.
Not too long ago, they would have just held their collective noses and kept the player– And their overpriced contract.
If he does I hope it's from 57 yards....I still don’t like it and hopefully there won’t be a bunch of crying and blaming it on JG if Bailey is lined up against us and kicks a game winning FG.
Damn, I'm surprised how much this move got to me....he made some huge kicks for us during his time here. I hate to see him go but I'm not necessarily saying it's the wrong move either.
Teams generally won’t use a 7th round pick on even the best college kickers, much less an older kicker with a high salary whose accuracy has declined by 9-10% each of the last 2 years and who is being peddled because his previous team doesn’t have as much confidence in him as they used to. Trades like this just don’t happen with kickers. Even so, if the team was undecided most of TC on which kicker to keep, how could they have traded him?
LOL, no it isn't. Just BTB and the sycophants on this board making excuses for the old fool at the helm and his kids. Bailey didn't miss a single kick last year before the injury. Not one. They saw a chance to save $$ and they grabbed it.I will always love Dan, but his decline over the last 2 years is pretty well chronicled
I’m confused about Bailey’s practice performance... yesterday I read in various places that his 41-47 (87%) on FGs were good and not a factor, and this piece is claiming it was a cause for concern. It certainly seems within an acceptable range, but maybe the other guy made them all...
Not sure what you mean but now that I look it was actually 42 out of 47 (89%).4/5 according to Archer, which isn't reassuring to me.
Not sure what you mean but now that I look it was actually 42 out of 47 (89%).
It seems like a prudent move, but its funny that hes the player we took a stand on lol. Meanwhile we've let others go along sucking for years.