News: BTB: Defensive Line Priority For Dallas Cowboys: Defensive Tackle Or Defensive End?

NewsBot

New Member
Messages
111,281
Reaction score
2,947
usa-today-7435881.0.jpg

There is little doubt that the Cowboys' defensive line needs a talent upgrade, but should that be at defensive tackle or defensive end?

Over the last 20 years, the average number of sacks per NFL team has oscillated pretty significantly, between a low of 32.4 in 2008 and a high of 41.7 in 1997, as the graph below illustrates.

Sacks_per_team.0.jpg

In the constant battle between pass rush and pass protection, each side is constantly trying to outmaneuver the other. When offenses move to three-step drops to avoid sacks, defenses start bringing pressure up the middle. Offenses that shore up their interior offensive line in response then find themselves vulnerable to the outside rush. And on and on it goes.

In a recent fanpost, BTB-member ScarletO showed that in 2014, almost 7 of 10 sacks by the defensive front were made by the defensive ends. He also pointed out that the Cowboys had one of the worst percentages of sacks from its defensive ends among 4-3 defensive fronts.

These numbers suggest two possible approaches for the Cowboys to improve their overall pass rush. The first is that the Cowboys need more production from their defensive ends, who need to get more pressure from the edge. The second is that the defensive tackles need to collapse the pocket much more. If the quarterback can't step up into the pocket to avoid the outside pressure, the production from the defensive ends should almost automatically increase as a result of more pressure up the middle.

Both of these approaches have their merits, which makes it difficult to determine which is the better option. With this in mind, we can consider three strategies to improve the defensive line and at the same time improve the pass rush this year - and we'll look at which one of the three strategies makes the most sense.

  • Sign a free agent outside rusher. The best free agent who could potentially be available is Justin Houston, who plays in a 3-4 scheme as an outside linebacker. But can he successfully make the switch to defensive end? And how much was he helped by having an outstanding interior defensive tackle (Dontari Poe) and an equally outstanding bookend OLB (Tamba Hali)? Another thing to consider is that in a 3-4 alignment it is more difficult to determine who the rushers are going to be, and that may have helped his numbers as well. Also, he may be too costly as far as the cap goes to be a realistic option.
  • Sign a free agent defensive tackle. The best choice here might be Nick Fairley. With Fairley, the question is how much playing next to Ndamukong Suh may have helped his numbers and effectiveness.
  • Draft a defensive tackle or defensive end. Because it usually takes about three years for many draft picks to really begin to come into their own, and with the window that Tony Romo realistically has, this one would seem to be the least favorable option. It should be noted that Zack Martin is the best example that rookies don't have to take three years to become outstanding, but keep in mind only the rarest are that good that soon. Also, picking late in the round the Cowboys may only get the fourth or fifth best player at a position like DE or DT, and that may not be good enough talent wise.



If the Cowboys choose to go with one of the free agent routes, it would seem to make more sense to go after the defensive tackle. The reason the quarterbacks hate pressure up the middle is the same exact reason we should go with the defensive tackle route and not the defensive end route. Had we gotten more pressure from the defensive tackles we might have seen Anthony Spencer and the other outside rushers have a much more impressive sack totals. And you build your team from the inside out, which means your defensive tackles are the ones to shore up before the defensive ends. One reason is the fact that the inside is where you have the most effect on stopping the running game as well as getting pressure up the middle, and that means a defensive tackle upgrade helps in both areas the most.

Keep in mind, the type of defensive tackle matters a lot also. When it comes to 4-3 defenses or even 3-4 defenses, the gap responsibility scheme is perhaps the most important factor to consider when looking at the type of player you need. If a team runs a two-gap scheme, then big guys like Tony Siragusa are desired, but in a one-gap system like the one Marinelli uses, it is more important to have guys that can play in the backfield instead of just holding the point of attack as they are asked to do in most two-gap systems.

If the Cowboys like Nick Fairley as much as I do, then they should do what it takes to get him. In an ideal free agency world, you want guys that are no older than 27, will not break the bank when you sign them, and are more than just a bridge or gap signing.

Whether by chance or by design, the Cowboys have shown a tendency to draft the best or second best player at his position with their top pick in the draft. The best defensive tackles will be long gone by the time the Cowboys' 27th pick rolls around. But if the Cowboys can sign Fairley, they could close a hole they probably won't be able to close with premier talent in the draft, and could use their 27th pick for premier talent at other positions, like running back or safety - or whoever is the best player who falls into their laps.

So, for me, signing a top free agent defensive tackle makes the most sense, and Nick Fairley seems to fit the type of player the Cowboys are looking for and he probably won't break the bank either.

And as they say, the games are won in the trenches!

Poll
What should the Cowboys do about their defensive line this off-season?

  • Sign a FA outside rusher
  • Sign a FA defensive tackle
  • Draft a Defensive End
  • Draft a Defensive Tackle

0 votes | Results

Continue reading...
 

xwalker

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,193
Reaction score
64,699
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
usa-today-7435881.0.jpg

There is little doubt that the Cowboys' defensive line needs a talent upgrade, but should that be at defensive tackle or defensive end?

Over the last 20 years, the average number of sacks per NFL team has oscillated pretty significantly, between a low of 32.4 in 2008 and a high of 41.7 in 1997, as the graph below illustrates.

Sacks_per_team.0.jpg

In the constant battle between pass rush and pass protection, each side is constantly trying to outmaneuver the other. When offenses move to three-step drops to avoid sacks, defenses start bringing pressure up the middle. Offenses that shore up their interior offensive line in response then find themselves vulnerable to the outside rush. And on and on it goes.

In a recent fanpost, BTB-member ScarletO showed that in 2014, almost 7 of 10 sacks by the defensive front were made by the defensive ends. He also pointed out that the Cowboys had one of the worst percentages of sacks from its defensive ends among 4-3 defensive fronts.

These numbers suggest two possible approaches for the Cowboys to improve their overall pass rush. The first is that the Cowboys need more production from their defensive ends, who need to get more pressure from the edge. The second is that the defensive tackles need to collapse the pocket much more. If the quarterback can't step up into the pocket to avoid the outside pressure, the production from the defensive ends should almost automatically increase as a result of more pressure up the middle.

Both of these approaches have their merits, which makes it difficult to determine which is the better option. With this in mind, we can consider three strategies to improve the defensive line and at the same time improve the pass rush this year - and we'll look at which one of the three strategies makes the most sense.

  • Sign a free agent outside rusher. The best free agent who could potentially be available is Justin Houston, who plays in a 3-4 scheme as an outside linebacker. But can he successfully make the switch to defensive end? And how much was he helped by having an outstanding interior defensive tackle (Dontari Poe) and an equally outstanding bookend OLB (Tamba Hali)? Another thing to consider is that in a 3-4 alignment it is more difficult to determine who the rushers are going to be, and that may have helped his numbers as well. Also, he may be too costly as far as the cap goes to be a realistic option.
  • Sign a free agent defensive tackle. The best choice here might be Nick Fairley. With Fairley, the question is how much playing next to Ndamukong Suh may have helped his numbers and effectiveness.
  • Draft a defensive tackle or defensive end. Because it usually takes about three years for many draft picks to really begin to come into their own, and with the window that Tony Romo realistically has, this one would seem to be the least favorable option. It should be noted that Zack Martin is the best example that rookies don't have to take three years to become outstanding, but keep in mind only the rarest are that good that soon. Also, picking late in the round the Cowboys may only get the fourth or fifth best player at a position like DE or DT, and that may not be good enough talent wise.



If the Cowboys choose to go with one of the free agent routes, it would seem to make more sense to go after the defensive tackle. The reason the quarterbacks hate pressure up the middle is the same exact reason we should go with the defensive tackle route and not the defensive end route. Had we gotten more pressure from the defensive tackles we might have seen Anthony Spencer and the other outside rushers have a much more impressive sack totals. And you build your team from the inside out, which means your defensive tackles are the ones to shore up before the defensive ends. One reason is the fact that the inside is where you have the most effect on stopping the running game as well as getting pressure up the middle, and that means a defensive tackle upgrade helps in both areas the most.

Keep in mind, the type of defensive tackle matters a lot also. When it comes to 4-3 defenses or even 3-4 defenses, the gap responsibility scheme is perhaps the most important factor to consider when looking at the type of player you need. If a team runs a two-gap scheme, then big guys like Tony Siragusa are desired, but in a one-gap system like the one Marinelli uses, it is more important to have guys that can play in the backfield instead of just holding the point of attack as they are asked to do in most two-gap systems.

If the Cowboys like Nick Fairley as much as I do, then they should do what it takes to get him. In an ideal free agency world, you want guys that are no older than 27, will not break the bank when you sign them, and are more than just a bridge or gap signing.

Whether by chance or by design, the Cowboys have shown a tendency to draft the best or second best player at his position with their top pick in the draft. The best defensive tackles will be long gone by the time the Cowboys' 27th pick rolls around. But if the Cowboys can sign Fairley, they could close a hole they probably won't be able to close with premier talent in the draft, and could use their 27th pick for premier talent at other positions, like running back or safety - or whoever is the best player who falls into their laps.

So, for me, signing a top free agent defensive tackle makes the most sense, and Nick Fairley seems to fit the type of player the Cowboys are looking for and he probably won't break the bank either.

And as they say, the games are won in the trenches!

Poll
What should the Cowboys do about their defensive line this off-season?

  • Sign a FA outside rusher
  • Sign a FA defensive tackle
  • Draft a Defensive End
  • Draft a Defensive Tackle

0 votes | Results

Continue reading...

Both.

Upgrading DT Nick Hayden would make the DE better. If you replaced Hayden with Suh, the same DE from 2014 would probably double their sack totals. With Hayden in the lineup, OLines always had an extra guy to block either Crawford or a DE.

Even if they go with just a DE in free agency, I think with a full off-season that Brent and Bishop could be better than Hayden and possibly much better.
 

DCBoysfan

Hardwork and Dedication
Messages
7,278
Reaction score
3,582
I like the idea of signing a player similar to Fariley, productive and price reasonable. Suh is going to be looking for 40+ in guaranteed money, so I doubt very seriously he is on Dallas radar.
 

Manwiththeplan

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,268
Reaction score
7,763
Did a 2nd grader do that graph? Several seasons with the same sack totals, make it look like an increase or decrease from year to year
 

unionjack8

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,439
Reaction score
27,102
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Did a 2nd grader do that graph? Several seasons with the same sack totals, make it look like an increase or decrease from year to year

My guess is those figures are rounded but the graph depicts fior example 36.6 and 37.4 yet states both as 37.
 

Galian Beast

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,735
Reaction score
7,457
Both.

Upgrading DT Nick Hayden would make the DE better. If you replaced Hayden with Suh, the same DE from 2014 would probably double their sack totals. With Hayden in the lineup, OLines always had an extra guy to block either Crawford or a DE.

Even if they go with just a DE in free agency, I think with a full off-season that Brent and Bishop could be better than Hayden and possibly much better.

I don't think this poster realizes that Hayden is a 1 technique and Suh is a 3 technique.
 

Yakuza Rich

Well-Known Member
Messages
18,043
Reaction score
12,385
You really have to go and find the right fit of a player and if it is in the draft the BPA. If I had to choose, I think DE is a far larger priority. Spencer doesn't have much tread on the tire and Lawrence is an unknown commodity. Meanwhile Crawford is really, really good...but if he gets injured you're really looking at some scrubs.

The DE position in the 4-3 has changed as it now relies on high motor guys that can get out on the perimeter and chase down field when the offense throws a quick screen pass. So it's not all about rushing the passer anymore and you have to account for how much you still value the position with that in mind.





YR
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
Give me a DL player who can get after the QB and is stout vs the run and I don't care where he lines up. I know often it is the DE who brings the heat I have also seen the likes of Randy White who brought a lot of heat from the DT spot.
 

Awakened

the Dude abides
Messages
1,600
Reaction score
1,228
Did a 2nd grader do that graph? Several seasons with the same sack totals, make it look like an increase or decrease from year to year

Haha, for real. The graph is not to scale. It is designed the way it is to exaggerate the differences.
 
Top