I don't know what you're talking about with Lovin. His first comment to me was that I was "talking out of my rectal cavity." I don't even know what point you're talking about.
HE HAS REACHED HIS CEILING IN TERMS OF HOW IMPACTFUL HE WILL BE AS A PLAYER. He can get better and still have the same impact, because he's not going to be a gamebreaker.
You were the one who brought in degrees, by talking about good, average, solid, great, and very good. What I'm saying is that, Schultz could develop into any of those, and we won't know the difference because he won't impact the game any differently, because unless a TE is a gamebreaker, there's no difference.
You're just failing to acknowledge the fact that all I'm really saying is that a TE's development, if they don't turn into a gamebreaker, does not go hand in hand with their impact on the game. There is almost no difference between Ertz and Hooper. And that's my point. Schultz, to his credit, is already good enough to be in that group. He'll move more towards Ertz as he gets older, but it doesn't really matter. This is his ceiling, it's the type of player he is.