******* Bucs vs Skins Game Thread *******

Cbz40

The Grand Poobah
Messages
31,387
Reaction score
39
Well I'll be,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
 

SultanOfSix

Star Power
Messages
12,220
Reaction score
6,995
OH BS. You are telling me that Simms didn't see him after staring him down for five seconds?
 

wxcpo

Active Member
Messages
2,513
Reaction score
1
Well game over, skins win. Looking forward to the Seahawks whipping the the crap out of the skins next week.
 

Cbz40

The Grand Poobah
Messages
31,387
Reaction score
39
Skins 121 yds of O.......set record for lowest production of a winning team in a playoff game....................................lol
 

DragonCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,498
Reaction score
250
some BS calls saved this team. I'll have fun seeing you get killed in Qwest you SOB team...
 

Wheat

Philosopher
Messages
2,925
Reaction score
4
ahhh, its always "Can't wait for the (X) to crush the Skins next week."

Yeah, our offense sucked, Portis looked hurt. We lost Wynn and Taylor.

But, a win is a win.

I'll take it.
 

lane

The Chairman
Messages
13,149
Reaction score
5,514
well.after watching this game........my suspicions are verified.
 

Hostile

The Duke
Messages
119,565
Reaction score
4,544
You think Simms would trade the Horns Natinonal Championship win for the win here?
 

lane

The Chairman
Messages
13,149
Reaction score
5,514
joe theismann is the biggest geek on the planet.
 

SultanOfSix

Star Power
Messages
12,220
Reaction score
6,995
lanecity1975 said:
well.after watching this game........my suspicions are verified.

There is no way you can tell me that wasn't a catch. The hypocrisy of "the rule" (another magical one like the tuck rule) was already made apparent earlier by myself.
 

lane

The Chairman
Messages
13,149
Reaction score
5,514
SultanOfSix said:
There is no way you can tell me that wasn't a catch. The hypocrisy of "the rule" (another magical one like the tuck rule) was already made apparent earlier by myself.


read the post directly on top of yours.

that was my suspicion.
 

Wheat

Philosopher
Messages
2,925
Reaction score
4
That was an easy replay to get right.

we all saw the ball smash into the ground and move around. It wasn't a catch.
 

SultanOfSix

Star Power
Messages
12,220
Reaction score
6,995
Wheat said:
That was an easy replay to get right.

we all saw the ball smash into the ground and move around. It wasn't a catch.

Um ok. Tell me how this isn't bull****:

I like how when a running back is tackled and his knee is down, the field cannot cause a fumble.

But somehow, if the receiver catches the ball and is tackled with the knee down and the ground causes a fumble, it's an incomplete pass.
 

Wheat

Philosopher
Messages
2,925
Reaction score
4
because he had the ball from a hand off, he had posession.

a WR has to get the ball in his hands and control it.
 

SultanOfSix

Star Power
Messages
12,220
Reaction score
6,995
Wheat said:
because he had the ball from a hand off, he had posession.

a WR has to get the ball in his hands and control it.

Yeah, which he did.

There was no bobbling or anything.

He caught it, his knee hit, then the ground caused the fumble.

How is it different?
 

lane

The Chairman
Messages
13,149
Reaction score
5,514
because the running back has already established posession.
 

SultanOfSix

Star Power
Messages
12,220
Reaction score
6,995
lanecity1975 said:
because the running back has already established posession.

Exactly, it's a question of possession. That's not what the ruling on the field stated.

He said, he has to have possession until he hits the ground and maintain it when he does. That is total BS.
 
Top