Burger King- Thinks Cowboys will cut TO

LatinMind;2589662 said:
james is a good lber on 1st and 2nd down. spencer cant play the run to save his life. burnett is a goner, but he left hamlin and davis out to dry too many times. dallas needs lb'ers plain and simple.

James is good on 3rd down when he is blitzing or playing right in the middle of the field, its when he has to run otuside in space vs the pass that he becomes a problem.

Spencer has been cited for quality play vs the run several times by Wade, so not sure when you got that he cant play the run at all.

Burnett will probably be gone, but if he stays he is capable of playing ILB FT I think. Ellis might be outta here as well, Carpenter too. Backup LB needs alot of help.
 
shaketiller;2589666 said:
I think they are more likely to win next season without Owens than they are with him.

:lmao2: How much did those rose colored shades set you back?
 
khiladi;2589671 said:
How doers anyone know what receiver Tony Romo is locked on when the helmet is covering his eyes and head?

because unlike you, we watch the plays during the games, and actually watch the games themselves
 
Bleu Star;2589674 said:
:lmao2: How much did those rose colored shades set you back?

150 bucks. Like them? The guy on Canal Street said they weren't knock-offs at all. Said they were the real thing.
 
khiladi;2589671 said:
How doers anyone know what receiver Tony Romo is locked on when the helmet is covering his eyes and head?

Could this be the source of the reliable weekly stream of INTs? I think you're onto something. :p:
 
shaketiller;2589505 said:
With a few exceptions, I think most Cowboys fans wanted to believe Owens would change, would become a more mature player. That's part of being a fan. I certainly hoped for the best. But time wounds all heels.

I can't put on thick enough blinders to ignore the internal strife that appears to have torn apart this team late in the season. And I can't ignore the fact that Owens, with his track record, was in the middle of it.

I also can't assume the kind of attitude that places, at this point, virtually every major football writer and media person in the same basket. They are individuals, some better at their jobs than others.

There is a point in a trial, where witness after witness has given the same testimony, and one must accept the accuracy of their reports. I think we've reached that point. Too many people have to be liars, rumor-mongerers, dolts, and incompetents in order to construct the theory that Owens is merely an innocent bystander.

The more likely scenario: Owens is at the heart of the problem.
:hammer:

5Stars gets it, too. No, cutting TO won't solve all problems, but so what? You solve as many problems as you can, one at a time.

I also like how 5Stars admits that he was all for TO and thought he'd change, but now he sees that isn't the case. I think too many people dig themselves into positions and refuse to ever change them, even in the face of new and conflicting evidence.
 
shaketiller;2589677 said:
150 bucks. Like them? The guy on Canal Street said they weren't knock-offs at all. Said they were the real thing.

:D u got ganked.
 
dbair1967;2589673 said:
James is good on 3rd down when he is blitzing or playing right in the middle of the field, its when he has to run otuside in space vs the pass that he becomes a problem.

Spencer has been cited for quality play vs the run several times by Wade, so not sure when you got that he cant play the run at all.

Burnett will probably be gone, but if he stays he is capable of playing ILB FT I think. Ellis might be outta here as well, Carpenter too. Backup LB needs alot of help.

james was hardly ever in on third down. unless it was 3rd and 1 or 2. i would like for u to show me where spencer was praised. and then id like for u to go to the thread posters ate him alive after that ravens game. and alot of people acknowledging that happened alot with spencer. burnett would be worn out by week 9 in a starters role in 3-4.
 
dbair1967;2589675 said:
because unlike you, we watch the plays during the games, and actually watch the games themselves
Guess what? Garrett and Romo actually analyze photogrpahs of the developing play on the sidelines, especially after Romo allegedly forces balls to TO, while receivers are 'open', according to you. If these receiver's are open, then what the hell is Garrett telling Romo? Oh, let me guess? Garrett is afraid of the big, bad bully that is TO....
 
Bleu Star;2589684 said:
:D u got ganked.

Dang. The same thing happened last year when I bought that diamond ring for my wife. Cubic zirconia. You'd think I'd learn.
 
Chocolate Lab;2589682 said:
I think too many people dig themselves into positions and refuse to ever change them, even in the face of new and conflicting evidence.

14.jpg
 
LatinMind;2589687 said:
james was hardly ever in on third down. unless it was 3rd and 1 or 2. i would like for u to show me where spencer was praised. and then id like for u to go to the thread posters ate him alive after that ravens game. and alot of people acknowledging that happened alot with spencer. burnett would be worn out by week 9 in a starters role in 3-4.

It was in the DMN and FWST several times at the end of the yr, it was one of the reasons Wade cited for playign Spencer more on 1st and 2nd down ahead of Ellis.
 
if owens it cut fine. but if he isnt, and next yr he puts up numbers and the cowboys win. espn(sources) or not, everybody will praise him. seems like when the team is winning everything is nothing. when the team loses its pick a scapegoat.
 
Bleu Star;2589664 said:
Actually, I sat back and analyzed every event that led up to Garrett shopping himself and formed my own opinion. He's running from his issues because he knows that if he lays another egg he can really start looking at that other line of work as a strong possibility.

I strongly believe Garrett would prefer to not have to "deal with" TO. Sadly, if he knew how to deal, his leadership would propel this super talented offense to the top.

there have been more respected and experienced coaches than JG that couldnt handle TO as well...I think him job hunting is more to do with ...he probably felt he and JJ had an agreement for him to take over if Wade failed again...and then when it didnt happen he wasnt happy about it...but I dont think he was being a coward.
 
Romo has progressions he goes through... Those progressions are dictated by the play-calls. It is not Romo's fault if his first, second and third progression are going downfield, while the OL can't sustain a pass-rush. It isn't Romo's fault that defenses know that the play-call is deep, so they just have to sit safetieis over the top and not worry about a non-existent play-action from Garrett to force them up. It isn't Romo's fault these safeties just lie back there, increasing the time Romo has to take to buy time int the pocket, run around and find somebody open...
 
LatinMind;2589697 said:
if owens it cut fine. but if he isnt, and next yr he puts up numbers and the cowboys win. espn(sources) or not, everybody will praise him. seems like when the team is winning everything is nothing. when the team loses its pick a scapegoat.

Trust me when I say some will not. Some hate him that much.
 
khiladi;2589689 said:
Guess what? Garrett and Romo actually analyze photogrpahs of the developing play on the sidelines, especially after Romo allegedly forces balls to TO, while receivers are 'open', according to you. If these receiver's are open, then what the hell is Garrett telling Romo? Oh, let me guess? Garrett is afraid of the big, bad bully that is TO....

You are absolutely fooling yourself if you think it isnt an issue everytime Romo drops back to pass.
 
dbair1967;2589696 said:
It was in the DMN and FWST several times at the end of the yr, it was one of the reasons Wade cited for playign Spencer more on 1st and 2nd down ahead of Ellis.

spencer played more the whole yr. not just the end. if u wanna bring ellis into it. history shows the cowboys always give up more rushing yrds when ellis isnt the field. fact
 
LatinMind;2589697 said:
if owens it cut fine. but if he isnt, and next yr he puts up numbers and the cowboys win. espn(sources) or not, everybody will praise him. seems like when the team is winning everything is nothing. when the team loses its pick a scapegoat.

I don't know about everyone, but I'll surely praise him. That's what it's all about. It's professional football. It's about winning and losing. If Owens returns and the team wins, I'll be a happy fan. As I've said, I don't "hate" Owens. I think he's a problem. If I'm proven wrong, fine. If I'm proven wrong because the Cowboys win with him... better than fine. Outstanding.

My self esteem isn't attached to my opinion of Owens. I'd like to see the Cowboys wins another Super Bowl, with or without him.
 
dbair1967;2589703 said:
You are absolutely fooling yourself if you think it isnt an issue everytime Romo drops back to pass.
Your not answering the question. if he has receiver's open all the time he is allegedly trying to throw to TO, what is Garrett telling Romo on the side-lines while they sit and stare at the game-shots that show the developing play? If it were so apparent that receiver's are open, why doesn't Romo find all these open receiver's the very next series. after the Red-genius was looking so hard at the game film, analyzing?
 
Back
Top