Bye-Bye HBO, TO, Pacman and Tank Johnson

[Brooksey]

If Wade is staying, we need to cut all distractions. He can't handle the HC position more less the locker room drama and the media circus. I will say TO has served us well on the field. I don't know about the locker room, I was not there but we need to go back to the drawing board, we need to get back to work, this is a team game. We need to create chemistry.

This is just a thought and not a knock against TO at all.

 

[Aven8]

If Wade is staying, we need to cut all distractions. He can't handle the HC position more less the locker room drama and the media circus. I will say TO has served us well on the field. I don't know about the locker room, I was not there but we need to go back to the drawing board, we need to get back to work, this is a team game. We need to create chemistry.

This is just a thought and not a knock against TO at all.

My sentiments exactly! Pacrat is a piece of crap! Tank is useless, and TO sucks! See ya!

The Turk is here to see you!!!!!!

 

[The Curly One]

I agree with getting rid of TO, Packman and you should add Flosmell to that list. Then look real close at all of the other offensive linemen.

 

[Joe Realist]

T.O. will be back. He just got a new contract. I will predict 2009 as his last season though.

 

[bysbox1]

I agree with getting rid of TO, Packman and you should add Flosmell to that list. Then look real close at all of the other offensive linemen.

TO is not going anywhere. We just signed him to a big extension and the cap hit would to difficult to handle next year.

Get used to seeing TO here next year.

Now it would not surprise me if Pacman and Tank Johnson are gone next year.

 

[Bleu Star]

If Wade is staying, we need to cut all distractions. He can't handle the HC position more less the locker room drama and the media circus. I will say TO has served us well on the field. I don't know about the locker room, I was not there but we need to go back to the drawing board, we need to get back to work, this is a team game. We need to create chemistry.

This is just a thought and not a knock against TO at all.

Ok. So correct me of I am wrong... You get rid of the talent but keep the coach that can't control, manage, prepare, coach, or police the talent? Something does not compute here.

 

[StarMan2112]

With Jerry running the show, I wouldn't be surprised if all those guys are back.

 

[Cajuncowboy]

No way on Earth anyone with any kind of football savvy would want to cut TO.

The guy is a play maker and he draws coverage. If you think RW2 had problems getting open with TO, imagine without him?

 

[dadymat]

Ok. So correct me of I am wrong... You get rid of the talent but keep the coach that can't control, manage, prepare, coach, or police the talent? Something does not compute here.

because the talent shouldnt have to be ...........Controlled......managed.....or Policed...............

 

[dadymat]

No way on Earth anyone with any kind of football savvy would want to cut TO.

The guy is a play maker and he draws coverage. If you think RW2 had problems getting open with TO, imagine without him?

you mean like the no savvy team that just embarr***** them 44-6?

 

[Bleu Star]

because the talent shouldnt have to be ...........Controlled......managed.....or Policed...............

Yes. It should. Do you have children? If so, do they pretty much get to do whatever they want to do whenever they want to do it with no parental boundaries? Your answer should be interesting to say the least.

 

[Brooksey]

TO is a playmaker but he is turning 35. I'll give him another year but get rid of Pacman, he stinks.

 

[Cajuncowboy]

you mean like the no savvy team that just embarr***** them 44-6?

To was not the problem today.

 

[LandryFan]

TO is not going anywhere. We just signed him to a big extension and the cap hit would to difficult to handle next year.

Get used to seeing TO here next year.

Now it would not surprise me if Pacman and Tank Johnson are gone next year.

I'm pretty sure Tank is gone, but I believe Pac is back next year unless he does something between now and then to get suspended again (which is a distinct possibility).

 

[Cajuncowboy]

TO is a playmaker but he is turning 35. I'll give him another year but get rid of Pacman, he stinks.

I agree, Pac and tank are very expendable.

 

[I LOVE ME SOME ME!]

you mean like the no savvy team that just embarr***** them 44-6?

Yeah the team that needed two other teams to lose to get in the playoffs. Please shut up

 

[dadymat]

Yes. It should. Do you have children? If so, do they pretty much get to do whatever they want to do whenever they want to do it with no parental boundaries? Your answer should be interesting to say the least.

yes i have children.........but they arent full grown men making millions as professionals.....i mean... my infant needs guidance but im hoping she will learn by the time she graduates college....if not maybe she can have a coaching staff babysit her in her mid 30's too.......

 

[LucaBrasi]

Distractions that take away from actual football? Not until the ownership changes. and that ain't happening.

 

[Bleu Star]

yes i have children.........but they arent full grown men making millions as professionals.....i mean... my infant needs guidance but im hoping she will learn by the time she graduates college....if not maybe she can have a coaching staff babysit her in her mid 30's too.......

I'm sure you get the parallel.

Based upon your logic there's no need for coaches in the NFL. The players can take care of meetings, drills, game management, accountability, etc all by themselves. Nice logic there.

 

[Parche]

you mean like the no savvy team that just embarr***** them 44-6?

Hey hey, just because they kicked our souls (or we let ourselves down, look at it as you want) the Eagles arent the next SB Champions...

And talking bout T.O. , Id worry bout his drops but not his heart of performance on the field (except drops). He´s elite at Wr and I dont see us beeing better getting rid of him.