you mean QB .00001 level IQ? should have learned it in pee weeFor the life of me, I don’t understand why a quarterback will be running towards outbounds know they’re fixing to get tackled for a loss why not just throw the ball past the line of scrimmage Out-abounds for real
I don't know why we keep trying to throw the slant to him, he can't win those routes..... every time Gallup is on 1 side its a wasted play.Gallup needs to be traded. Plain and simple. He's done.
fans
not enough feces and vomit is being thrown at the games
make the other teams fear us...i want jerryworld covered in excrement
LeagueFor us or the league? Because last year lamb thrived on plays in motion
I sure hope so. These backs can run but need blocking up front to do what they do.Line will get better with some time off.
He looked like he was starting to find something a few weeks ago. Not opposed to trading him but if its for low round compensation whats the point? He may be needed at some point to come up with a big catch and whats behind him is unproven.Gallup needs to be traded. Plain and simple. He's done.
Some team use a lot of motion, some none. Some of that may be scheme or the recievers they have. But lamb plays well out of motion. It gets him a running start and makes double teams harder. Moving parts in the defense can cause blown coverages on other guys. I think for lamb specifically motion is a weapon we need to use more. I’d also like to see more crossing routes. Hardest routes to cover. But a one game bye doesn’t allow all that much change. The biggest thing it allows is dinged up guys to get healthyLeague
Witten final season:Maybe we can entice Jason Witten out of retirement...again.
You need a snickers bar.fans
not enough feces and vomit is being thrown at the games
make the other teams fear us...i want jerryworld covered in excrement
Fir what? Next years 8th . Nobody is trading you anything for MGGallup needs to be traded. Plain and simple. He's done.
Why would somebody trade for him if he's done?Gallup needs to be traded. Plain and simple. He's done.
I heard that too. Said Dallas did better with no motion as opposed to using motion. HmmmmOn Sirius radio nfl channel this morning they said using motion and not using motion was equal in successful positive plays. Like 40/40 I believe they said.
They're listeningThese are some of the changes I'd like to see coming off the bye week to improve the offence. Mike's got to realize what's working and what's not.
- Give Rico a bigger portion of carries
- More misdirection runs, less up the gut
- Less Gallup, more Tolbert / Turpin
- Keep feeding 88 / 3
- More plays to get Dak on the move
- Use more pre-snap motion / Play action
- More designed QB runs / RPO looks