texbumthelife
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 22,738
- Reaction score
- 23,273
This has been already discussed. I can link you theo's rejoinder but I am not overly in the mood to repeat what has already been covered.
You apparently do not understand the college rules and want to play ref. There were no flags. The completion was a comeback when the QB had all day.
The 2:54 play he is out of the shot when the WR cuts so you cannot see what happened. The 3:05 interception saw him peel off his man and come back to highpoint the ball. What do ball skills mean? 2:06 he looks back for the ball and youre wrong that wouldn't be called in the NFL. :45 was a slant thrown low and inside like you are supposed to. He didn't tackle him the WR went to the ground to try and catch the low throw. I'll give you 1:20. He did fall down turning around to look for the ball. Technique hasn't caught up to obvious instincts.
Outside that you wave at a stat lines and don't discuss the actual matchup. That posits nothing. For all you know they lined up the WR on the opposite side. My point is taht there is tape to evaluate him against top competition and the hearsay I have heard is that despite his team being blown out he acquitted himself well. Grain of salt caveats certainly apply.
You just want to argue about how to debate. You have no argument, all you have is you grumbling disagreements with mine. You've brought absolutely nothing to the table. We can curb this and revisit in a few years. We have both been here for a while, so I expect we'll still be here at that time.
If at any point he has achieved anything more than being an OK second corner, I will be more than happy to eat my crow. Something tells me you'll still find excuses though.