C Mike looking great

Bleu Star

Bye Felicia!
Messages
33,925
Reaction score
19,920
Saw thread title "C Mike looking great", expected something at least mildly impressive.

16 rushes for 84 yards. Long, 10. TD, zero.

Title probably should've read something like "C Mike looking pedestrian".

84 rushing yards in a win is only pedestrian to those with biased opinions.
 

Nightman

Capologist
Messages
27,121
Reaction score
24,038
Saw thread title "C Mike looking great", expected something at least mildly impressive.

16 rushes for 84 yards. Long, 10. TD, zero.

Title probably should've read something like "C Mike looking pedestrian".

Try and tell me he is not looking great

COPOZ-tUsAAxSoc.jpg
 

DandyDon52

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,782
Reaction score
16,658
84 rushing yards in a win is only pedestrian to those with biased opinions.

5.2 avg, BB had 9 / 43/ 4.7avg
So they had 127 yds with those 2 rb, plus Russel had 5 for 46 so 173 total.
CM did his job good, maybe he can earn a position back with them, but he is a head case.
 

Bleu Star

Bye Felicia!
Messages
33,925
Reaction score
19,920
5.2 avg, BB had 9 / 43/ 4.7avg
So they had 127 yds with those 2 rb, plus Russel had 5 for 46 so 173 total.
CM did his job good, maybe he can earn a position back with them, but he is a head case.

Yup.. Like I said, pedestrian to the haters.

Charles Haley was a head case too.
 

Miller

ARTIST FORMERLY KNOWN AS TEXASFROG
Messages
12,307
Reaction score
13,906
Guess they didn't care about suits. So the Seahawks rent him to us, get a draft pick and then get him back to use for their stretch run. And we wonder why they are run so much better.
 

JohnnyHopkins

This is a house of learned doctors
Messages
11,302
Reaction score
3,610
Guess they didn't care about suits. So the Seahawks rent him to us, get a draft pick and then get him back to use for their stretch run. And we wonder why they are run so much better.

:laugh: Yeah, the Seahawks made out well on that one.
 

Proximo

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,697
Reaction score
9,117
:lmao2:
Wow, and I thought I heard it all....this is a huge stretch on knocking the coaches....if that was the intent....not sure if serious....

It's hilarious, I agree, but I think the poster you quoted is actually serious.
 

BrAinPaiNt

Mike Smith aka Backwoods Sexy
Staff member
Messages
78,651
Reaction score
42,995
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Granted against Cleveland, but I hated us releasing him... His physical talent running the ball is undeniable.

If he was so good...they should have never gotten rid of him in the first place.

6331f07080d5c8a1ef39a4935b3eabf3.jpg
 

Sarge

Red, White and Brew...
Staff member
Messages
33,771
Reaction score
31,538
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Saw thread title "C Mike looking great", expected something at least mildly impressive.

16 rushes for 84 yards. Long, 10. TD, zero.

Title probably should've read something like "C Mike looking pedestrian".

What's wrong with 5.25 yards per carry? :huh::huh:
 

jterrell

Penguinite
Messages
33,874
Reaction score
15,969
What's wrong with 5.25 yards per carry? :huh::huh:

wrong? Nothing. But it is far from GREAT!!.

CMike isn't here because he couldn't learn the system.
He is very slow apparently.

Not all that surprisingly he went back the system he actually knows even though they thought he was their 4th best back to start the year.

Anyone ruing that loss is football dumb.
 
Last edited:

jterrell

Penguinite
Messages
33,874
Reaction score
15,969
Guess they didn't care about suits. So the Seahawks rent him to us, get a draft pick and then get him back to use for their stretch run. And we wonder why they are run so much better.

well gosh, guess they are genius....
wonder why they used a 2nd round pick on him and got 68 carries in 3 years....

they are sooo much smarter than everyone else....
good lord.
 

Sarge

Red, White and Brew...
Staff member
Messages
33,771
Reaction score
31,538
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
wrong? Nothing. But it is far from GREAT!!.

CMike isn't here because he couldn't learn the system.
He is very slow apparently.

Not all that surprisingly he went back the system he actually knows even though they thought he was their 4th best back to start the year.

Anyone ruing that loss is football dumb.

Good. I'm glad we agree. :rolleyes:
 

Miller

ARTIST FORMERLY KNOWN AS TEXASFROG
Messages
12,307
Reaction score
13,906
well gosh, guess they are genius....
wonder why they used a 2nd round pick on him and got 68 carries in 3 years....

they are sooo much smarter than everyone else....
good lord.

Well considering their track record the last 4 years and the fact that the scrub that your Making fun got them a free 5th rounder while basically retaining him says a lot about us. So yes they are run better. I'd love to be in multiple SBs as of late and have a hot team entering the playoffs
 

jterrell

Penguinite
Messages
33,874
Reaction score
15,969
Well considering their track record the last 4 years and the fact that the scrub that your Making fun got them a free 5th rounder while basically retaining him says a lot about us. So yes they are run better. I'd love to be in multiple SBs as of late and have a hot team entering the playoffs

Ahh stupidity season is upon us.
Seattle is absolutely ran better than us. No one suggested it wasn't.
Unfortunately, using Christine Michael as an example is about as stupid as it gets.

He was a 2nd round pick who has gained 390 yards in 3 seasons.
Joseph Randle was a 5th round pick the same season and had 822 yards.

But Michael has returned to do great things off the waiver wire WHERE EVERY NFL TEAM HAD A CHANCE TO CLAIM HIM.
He has 6 carries for 6 yards today through 3 quarters.

Boy, those crafty Seahawks....

What you are positng is stupid, just stop.
The people liking it are even more stupid.

Cowboyszone needs a New Years resolution: Less stupid in 2016.

By the way, don't let the facts hurt you too badly but the Cowboys are giving up a 7th round pick for Michael.. not a 5th.
 

Miller

ARTIST FORMERLY KNOWN AS TEXASFROG
Messages
12,307
Reaction score
13,906
Ahh stupidity season is upon us.
Seattle is absolutely ran better than us. No one suggested it wasn't.
Unfortunately, using Christine Michael as an example is about as stupid as it gets.

He was a 2nd round pick who has gained 390 yards in 3 seasons.
Joseph Randle was a 5th round pick the same season and had 822 yards.

But Michael has returned to do great things off the waiver wire WHERE EVERY NFL TEAM HAD A CHANCE TO CLAIM HIM.
He has 6 carries for 6 yards today through 3 quarters.

Boy, those crafty Seahawks....

What you are positng is stupid, just stop.
The people liking it are even more stupid.

Cowboyszone needs a New Years resolution: Less stupid in 2016.

By the way, don't let the facts hurt you too badly but the Cowboys are giving up a 7th round pick for Michael.. not a 5th.

Well someone really has an inferiority complex here. Your use of the word stupidity seems to suggest you have issues. 1) I never said he was good or great 2) I never said the Seahawks were smart drafting him. I said they got a draft pick out of a guy they rented to us while we are left with nothing. Thus them getting over. PLUS you fail to realize that if their 2nd Rd pick was so bad as to be a 4th stringer who would offer a pick for him? Ohhhh, we did! Reading comprehension would help people like you. I'll put my Cowboy and football smarts since 1975 against people drinking loud mouth punch like you daily. New Years 2016 for Cowboyzone...get rid of people who have no reading and comprehension skills thus turning them into dense loud mouths that ruin threads

By the way, your post just proves how dumb we were to give up a pick for a guy you think sucks! Thanks for that incoherent rant to prove my point!
 
Last edited:

jterrell

Penguinite
Messages
33,874
Reaction score
15,969
Well someone really has an inferiority complex here. Your use of the word stupidity seems to suggest you have issues. 1) I never said he was good or great 2) I never said the Seahawks were smart drafting him. I said they got a draft pick out of a guy they rented to us while we are left with nothing. Thus them getting over. PLUS you fail to realize that if their 2nd Rd pick was so bad as to be a 4th stringer who would offer a pick for him? Ohhhh, we did! Reading comprehension would help people like you. I'll put my Cowboy and football smarts since 1975 against people drinking loud mouth punch like you daily. New Years 2016 for Cowboyzone...get rid of people who have no reading and comprehension skills thus turning them into dense loud mouths that ruin threads

By the way, your post just proves how dumb we were to give up a pick for a guy you think sucks! Thanks for that incoherent rant to prove my point!

No, it suggests I have little patience for stupid as I clearly noted... and good lord if you aren' t earning that title.

Seattle didn't get that 7th for nothing. They ATE A 200k CAP HIT trading CMike to us. They didn't get ANYTHING over on us. We traded away a conditional 7th for a guy we would have claimed on waivers because we had a major injury to Dunbar and Randle was off his rocker if not meds. We've been bottom-feeeding at RB all year. We traded a 5th round pick for Brice Butler... the 7th for Michael is a complete throw away because we have at least THREE 6th round picks. .

It is a shame Michael has always been stupid (now I get it.. you guys are related right? or at least attended the same remedial courses in school???) because he clearly has an NFL caliber body and skillset.
It's just the brain that's lacking.

To re-cap. This isn't hard. Dallas gave up basically nothing to get a look at a guy Seattle didn't want anymore.
The Seahawks don't feel lucky AT ALL because they only took CM back after injuries to backs they ACTUALLY LIKE.
No GM is counting a 7th round pick as some master stroke in trade.

When you post dumb things the easiest thing to do is either 1. say lol yea my bad. 2. move on and ignore the thread.

You lost a long time ago, digging deeper isn't helping.
You have zero grasp of the facts or the logic required to make any tangible football point here.
Enjoy the ignore list.
 
Top