DFWJC
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 59,982
- Reaction score
- 48,729
That's what I was thinking...about 100 mil with 50-60 guaranteed.
Wow
Just as expected...about 100 mil with 50-60 guaranteed.
I recall some of the whining going on around here when Romo signed his deal a couple of years ago.
If you go by average per year, Romo is now 11th.
Honestly,they should have let him go.
Get another qb in the draft.
People just complained because it was Romo, then add in the projected cap hits and it just added to the overpaid fallacy. Romo has been underpaid almost his entire career and its becoming more apparent with each new deal. Just wait until "Russell "Bus Driver" Wilson gets his new deal or Luck gets his for that matter.
Romo hasn't been underpaid. Contract totals always increase. Comparing contracts written 5 or 7 years apart is pointless.
Romo hasn't been underpaid. Contract totals always increase. Comparing contracts written 5 or 7 years apart is pointless.
Shocker. It's not fully guaranteed.
And everyone in Seattle just crapped themselves haha
Romo has signed a below market deal BOTH times he extended. He's been a top 5 QB at minimum and could have easily got bigger contracts if he wanted from the Cowboys or someone else if he was set on getting it.
Peyton signed a 7 year 99.2 million deal in 2003, Vick signed a 10 year 130 million in 2004, JaMarcus Russell signed a 6 year 61 million deal in 2007. Romo could have gotten longer security and more money if that was his goal with his 1st deal. His latest extension averages 18 million per season, which even when he signed was less than market value which was demonstrated by other teams and QBs around the same time. He has been underpaid his entire career.
Shocker. It's not fully guaranteed.
Romo hasn't been underpaid. Contract totals always increase. Comparing contracts written 5 or 7 years apart is pointless.
Romo took less than market value.
He basically signed a 4 year 68m extension. That's 17m a year.
Even if gets the last 40m that only gets him to 20m for 2 years.
And we could knock off any arbitrary number of years we like for any contract to bring the yearly average down.
Not sure why we would do that, but I guess we could.