TellerMorrow34
BraveHeartFan
- Messages
- 28,358
- Reaction score
- 5,077
I would absolutely, totally, and completely hate this move. We have far more pressing needs than a QB to sit behind Romo for a few years.
yea my bad i totally forgot i could read minds rofl you're hilarious.Hostile;3858359 said:I am calm and it shouldn't have needed explaining.
Are you drunk? You said you'd be pissed if we took him. So I said you won't be pissed. A damned 1st grader could figure that out. So don't blame me for mind reading and other crap.pupulehaole;3858362 said:yea my bad i totally forgot i could read minds rofl you're hilarious.
Hostile;3858364 said:Are you drunk? You said you'd be pissed if we took him. So I said you won't be pissed. A damned 1st grader could figure that out. So don't blame me for mind reading and other crap.
Good, because if you are this surly when someone is trying to be friendly and you aren't drunk I'd hate to be friendly when you are.pupulehaole;3858365 said:Bro "you're not going to be pissed" could have so many different explanations but whatever this is petty lol so ill just stop. Oh and no i'm not drunk....
:laugh2:Hostile;3858373 said:Good, because if you are this surly when someone is trying to be friendly and you aren't drunk I'd hate to be friendly when you are.
Nothing needed explanation.pupulehaole;3858355 said:lol.... maybe you need to calm down and explain yourself next time.
carphalen5150;3858290 said:If you view him as a franchise QB you never pass on them to fill a need.
Dash28;3858451 said:Nothing needed explanation.
Dash28;3858451 said:Nothing needed explanation.
proline;3858528 said:Actually, I read it the way pup... did. Sounded like Hos was guaranteeing that Cam will be a huge success and he wouldn't have a reason to be pissed. So make that 2 people that needed explanations.

dbair1967;3858524 said:There's no way in hell Garrett's hitching his coaching career on Cam Newton.
Seriously?proline;3858528 said:Actually, I read it the way pup... did. Sounded like Hos was guaranteeing that Cam will be a huge success and he wouldn't have a reason to be pissed.
So make that 2 people that needed explanations.
Dash28;3858570 said:Seriously?
He said he would be pissed if we selected Cam, Hos said that he wouldn't be pissed. To make it simple, Newton will not be our selection so he won't be pissed.

proline;3858745 said:Look, I get it. But it's a stretch to say that it was obvious. Since pupulehaole said that he would be pissed IF Newton was picked, and Hos's reply didn't address the conditional, then it is readily implied from Hos's response that he is arguing about the same conditional, i.e. not throwing another issue into the argument.
Let's try this:
pupulehaole: If it rains, my car in the driveway is going to get wet.
Hostile: No, your car won't get wet.
According to several of you, we are supposed to imply from Hos's reply that it isn't going to rain. If that's how you communicate, all I can say is![]()
pupulehaole;3858879 said:Rofl youre a ****** man.
DAL @ GB
LAR ARI
24%
IND TEN
14%
CAR @PHI
11%
