It seems reasonable to me to expect that you would read what is actually written, and not editorialize it. I asked a rhetorical question - it was a joke referencing Julius' ability to roll up on bad run defenses. So I said four OF THE worst. Not the four worst. There's a difference, and there's nothing for you to agree with. Grammar is your friend.
In addition, I said nothing about Carolina surrendering around 200 yards, and I never said Seattle allowed more than Julius gained on them. But, here's what other backs did against the Bears and Seahawks (who I actually DID reference, but you somehow read Chicago as Carolina
) I'll include NY, who Julius rolled on
Before Seattle played us in 04, they gave up 120 yards and 4 TDs to McGahee. Before that Faulk torched them for 139 yards. After they played us Martin ran for 134 and 2 TDs against them.
The week before we played Chicago, they allowed James to run for 200 yards and a TD, and Rhodes an extra 50. The week after they allowed MIN to rush for 129 yards on 19 carries, a 6.8 yard average. Folowed by Dominick Davis getting 100 and a TD.
NY allowed 160 yards to PIT, 170 to BAL, and 211 to WAshington before playing us.
The rankings of those defenses?
BEars - 25th ranked rushing d
Seattle - 23rd ranked rushing D
NY Giants - 28th ranked rushing D
Some of the worst in the league.
I hope he can be more consistent. But right now, he's just inconsistent and average at best. Blaming that on anyone but Julius is ridiculous.