Can we all agree that Dak is at least a decent QB?

[TheMarathonContinues]

The thing is...that way just leads to more warfare. You fight fire with fire...and escalation.

I'm am not here to gain anyone's respect..like you seem to be. So that part of it is not a battle for me...like it is for you.

I do enjoy the comraderie...and certainly some friendly banter...even in disagreement. I have mended fences that I have broken by showing some humbleness. Not lectures.

Sometimes you have to give a little....give it back FIRST...be the bigger man. Instant respect. Not fire with fire.

I’m not here to gain anyone’s respect. 10 percent of this site is full of bigots and idiots who cares what they think lol? You treat people the way you want to be treated. Simple as that. You learn this as a child.

 

[CowboyoWales]

So isn't it safe to say that Foles is as good as Rodgers?? They both have the same amount of Superbowl success, correct? No excuses!!

I dont care how history judge's players and ranking QB's is near impossible with the methodology you can use. The only factor that maters is that Foles (who's nothing special) was able to go through the play-offs ,with a rating over 100 in each game, and come away with a ring. Now look into that as you will, however, he still did his bit.

 

[Motorola]

OMG, not another Dak thread....here come the usual suspects... Iover/under is at 15 pages

15th page started about 25 minutes ago -- post #281, by 'TheMarathonContinue'

 

[Streifenkarl]

Another thing, why is Dak so controversial? He’s not special and he’s not horrible. He’s inconsistent and can wow you one day and crap the bed the next. Life in the middle is so much less exhausting

Well that's the thing. Dak just isn't anything. Yet this team seems to believe he is everything. The truth is probably somewhere in the middle and worse QBs than him have won it all. But then you have to build the team around him accordingly. And all those wasted seasons will be all that's left of these years, since they can't do that. But hey, at least we're... relevant.

 

[GINeric]

I dont care how history judge's players and ranking QB's is near impossible with the methodology you can use. The only factor that maters is that Foles (who's nothing special) was able to go through the play-offs ,with a rating over 100 in each game, and come away with a ring. Now look into that as you will, however, he still did his bit.

And this is why I say you don't need an elite quarterback to win the superbowl. History proves that as well.

 

[ak47kaehu]

I dunno man....a decent QB would have gotten us past the 49ers this past post season........especially with the effort that our defense gave holding that offense to 19 pts. A decent QB would not have thrown that pass straight to Warner in the red zone!

 

[kskboys]

I've heard many people say he's the second greatest "arguably" behind Brady. And yes, that is really dumb IMO.

Payton was better than Rodgers.